Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1331 - 1340 of 30299 for up.

[PDF] CA Blank Order
Cole and the victim. The trial court ultimately sentenced Cole—who was facing up to forty-five years
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220831 - 2018-10-04

COURT OF APPEALS
. The basic penalty is six years of imprisonment and up to a $10,000 fine or both. But then it also has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93172 - 2013-02-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of imprisonment and up to a $10,000 fine or both. But then it also has an enhancement based on repeater status
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93172 - 2014-09-15

David Friedman v. Arnold J. Stueber
. While Friedman and his friends were sitting at the bar, Arnold Stueber, who they did not know, came up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3100 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Joseph V. Hotynski
Hotynski started backing up, closing the distance between his vehicle and the squad car. The officer put
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9827 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] City of Sheboygan v. Michael J. Grohskopf
to the City of Sheboygan Police Department in order to pick up his friend who had been arrested earlier
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11515 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the filing of the order to show cause, Jackson “still ha[d] not even registered or signed up to utilize
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=220001 - 2018-09-27

[PDF] DC Transport of Wisconsin, Inc. v. Kenneth Hass
, Kenneth Hass. In January 1999, the parties entered into a relationship whereby Hass would pick up
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16078 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
between 2000 and 2004 would be “about $74,000 …. So his income I think has gone up a little bit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26831 - 2006-10-16

[PDF] Fond du Lac County v. Elizabeth M.P.
pursuant to § 51.20(11), and a concurrent motion to postpone the hearing for up to seven calendar days
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12270 - 2014-09-15