Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13301 - 13310 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13301 - 13310 of 30134 for consulta de causas.
Riviera Airport, Inc. v. Pierce County
the interpretation of the riverway zoning ordinance, a question of law that we review de novo. See Welter v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15904 - 2005-03-31
the interpretation of the riverway zoning ordinance, a question of law that we review de novo. See Welter v. City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15904 - 2005-03-31
County of Walworth v. Allen T. Ritchey
subject to our de novo review. See Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 220 Wis. 2d 656
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20224 - 2005-11-15
subject to our de novo review. See Tateoka v. City of Waukesha Bd. of Zoning Appeals, 220 Wis. 2d 656
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20224 - 2005-11-15
State v. Scott R. Weber
to construe §§ 973.09(1)(b) and 973.20, Stats. Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14438 - 2005-03-31
to construe §§ 973.09(1)(b) and 973.20, Stats. Statutory construction is a question of law that we review de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14438 - 2005-03-31
City of New Berlin v. William P. Servi
the challenge is to the court’s application of the implied consent to those facts, our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26568 - 2006-09-26
the challenge is to the court’s application of the implied consent to those facts, our review is de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26568 - 2006-09-26
State v. Michael R. Weber
. This case rests upon statutory construction, which is a question of law, and this court applies a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14517 - 2005-03-31
. This case rests upon statutory construction, which is a question of law, and this court applies a de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14517 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38611 - 2009-07-29
erroneous, and we review de novo the application of those facts to the constitutional standard. See State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38611 - 2009-07-29
State v. Robert E. Irish
] The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159 Wis.2d 754, 760-61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11250 - 2005-03-31
] The construction of a statute is a question of law that we review de novo. In re J.W.T., 159 Wis.2d 754, 760-61
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11250 - 2005-03-31
Timothy J. Kopke v. A. Hartrodt S.R.L.
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3230 - 2005-03-31
review is de novo. See Green Spring Farms v. Kersten, 136 Wis. 2d 304, 315, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3230 - 2005-03-31
City of Monroe v. Steven L. Furgason
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Wilke v. City of Appleton, 197 Wis.2d 717, 726, 541 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12281 - 2005-03-31
is a question of law which this court reviews de novo. Wilke v. City of Appleton, 197 Wis.2d 717, 726, 541 N.W
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12281 - 2005-03-31
State v. Joachim E. Dressler
is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶24. ¶6 Dressler makes several arguments which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21642 - 2006-03-07
is a question of law we review de novo. See id., ¶24. ¶6 Dressler makes several arguments which
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=21642 - 2006-03-07