Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13301 - 13310 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law, which are reviewed de novo. See State v. Dean, 163 Wis. 2d 503, 510, 471 N.W.2d 310 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44852 - 2009-12-22

Town of Sheboygan v. City of Sheboygan
review de novo. Id. ¶8 The Town argues that findings made under Wis. Stat. § 66.0203(9)(h
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3891 - 2005-03-31

State v. Jeffrey A. Huck
]he ultimate determination of whether counsel’s performance was deficient and prejudicial” de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15520 - 2005-03-31

State v. Timothy Zeilinger
they are clearly erroneous.” Id. The second step is to “review the determination of reasonable suspicion de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6104 - 2005-03-31

City of Clintonville v. Michael J. Kuhn
), but whether those facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3919 - 2011-04-24

Pierce County Department of Human Services v. Dawn B.
). This claim is an attack on the trial court’s interpretation of the Children’s Code, and is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12878 - 2013-05-28

County of Jefferson v. Mark L. Guttenberg
statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2013-05-28

Darryl Kusz v. The Home Insurance Company
. Although we value a trial court’s decision on summary judgment questions, our standard of review is de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12985 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
to de-escalate the situation by standing between Norwood and the woman, Norwood punched him. ¶4
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=106032 - 2013-12-26

COURT OF APPEALS
. I, § 7. Whether admission of evidence violates an accused’s right to confrontation is reviewed de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=117121 - 2014-07-14