Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13301 - 13310 of 30115 for de.
Search results 13301 - 13310 of 30115 for de.
County of Jefferson v. Mark L. Guttenberg
statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2005-03-31
statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo. State v. Krier, 165
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12876 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
). Whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de novo, but whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59003 - 2011-01-18
). Whether a set of facts constitutes a new factor is a question of law that we review de novo, but whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59003 - 2011-01-18
State v. Leonard Bendlin
of the trial court’s determination that Bendlin was “in custody” is de novo. See State v. Clappes, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13630 - 2005-03-31
of the trial court’s determination that Bendlin was “in custody” is de novo. See State v. Clappes, 136 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13630 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06(4), is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98788 - 2013-07-01
. § 974.06(4), is a question of law subject to de novo review. State v. Kletzien, 2011 WI App 22, ¶16, 331
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98788 - 2013-07-01
COURT OF APPEALS
Nelson’s testimony in the trial de novo had limited Nelson’s claim to the amount called for under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30543 - 2007-10-09
Nelson’s testimony in the trial de novo had limited Nelson’s claim to the amount called for under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30543 - 2007-10-09
COURT OF APPEALS
was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant is reviewed de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2011-02-22
was deficient and whether it prejudiced the defendant is reviewed de novo. Johnson, 153 Wis. 2d at 128. I
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2011-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
and 814.29. Statutory interpretation and application are questions of law that an appellate court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86384 - 2005-03-31
and 814.29. Statutory interpretation and application are questions of law that an appellate court reviews de
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=86384 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
a contract is unconscionable is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶25. Here, Thayse contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95987 - 2005-10-24
a contract is unconscionable is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶25. Here, Thayse contends
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95987 - 2005-10-24
City of Clintonville v. Michael J. Kuhn
), but whether those facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3919 - 2005-03-31
), but whether those facts constitute probable cause to arrest is a question of law which we decide de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3919 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the standard of probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. County of Jefferson v. Renz, 231
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102984 - 2010-08-12
the standard of probable cause is a question of law that we review de novo. County of Jefferson v. Renz, 231
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=102984 - 2010-08-12