Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13321 - 13330 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13321 - 13330 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of this case. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121562 - 2014-09-17
of this case. Interpretation and application of a statute are questions of law that we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121562 - 2014-09-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the actual penalty is de minimus. See State v. Cross, 2010 WI 70, ¶4, 326 Wis. 2d 492, 786 N.W.2d 64
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121300 - 2014-09-15
and the actual penalty is de minimus. See State v. Cross, 2010 WI 70, ¶4, 326 Wis. 2d 492, 786 N.W.2d 64
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=121300 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Richard A. M.
to effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21520 - 2017-09-21
to effective assistance of counsel is ultimately a legal determination, which this court decides de novo. Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=21520 - 2017-09-21
WI App 146 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2010AP1377-CR Complete Titl...
interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769. An appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72346 - 2011-11-28
interpretation de novo. State v. Stenklyft, 2005 WI 71, ¶7, 281 Wis. 2d 484, 697 N.W.2d 769. An appellate court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72346 - 2011-11-28
State v. Arnold E. Lounsbury
facts, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Collett, 207 Wis.2d 319, 321, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
facts, a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Collett, 207 Wis.2d 319, 321, 558 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15130 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED November 15, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of ...
as undisputed; the application of the law to such facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27119 - 2007-07-23
as undisputed; the application of the law to such facts is a question of law that we review de novo. See City
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27119 - 2007-07-23
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. On appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
counsel’s assistance was ineffective is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id., ¶21. On appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010475 - 2025-09-17
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and constitutional standards is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137-38. ¶6 Under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66905 - 2014-09-15
and constitutional standards is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. at 137-38. ¶6 Under the Fourth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66905 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
conviction, but in any event there was also evidence indicating that S.H. attempted to de-escalate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342222 - 2021-03-03
conviction, but in any event there was also evidence indicating that S.H. attempted to de-escalate
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=342222 - 2021-03-03
[PDF]
Gordon Ahlgren v. Pierce County
interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9449 - 2017-09-19
interpretation presents a question of law that we review de novo. State ex rel. Frederick v. McCaughtry, 173
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9449 - 2017-09-19