Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13321 - 13330 of 15565 for probate.
Search results 13321 - 13330 of 15565 for probate.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the incident, Kandutsch was supervised under the state’s electronic monitoring program. Kandutsch’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55033 - 2010-10-04
of the incident, Kandutsch was supervised under the state’s electronic monitoring program. Kandutsch’s probation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=55033 - 2010-10-04
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his probation). ¶15 In addition, contrary to Sisavangone’s argument, the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30
of his probation). ¶15 In addition, contrary to Sisavangone’s argument, the trial court did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016379 - 2025-09-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of probation. The dispositional order was then extended for an additional year, until December 12, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160761 - 2017-09-21
of probation. The dispositional order was then extended for an additional year, until December 12, 2012
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=160761 - 2017-09-21
Kieth M. Ferries v. Gerald W. Laabs
probate proceedings. The facts were stipulated and the issues were decided on the parties’ briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11806 - 2005-03-31
probate proceedings. The facts were stipulated and the issues were decided on the parties’ briefs
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11806 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mel Scott Regazzi
of probation. Regazzi appeals to challenge the denial of his suppression motion. See Wis. Stat. § 971.31(10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6643 - 2005-03-31
of probation. Regazzi appeals to challenge the denial of his suppression motion. See Wis. Stat. § 971.31(10
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6643 - 2005-03-31
2009 WI APP 177
for the “lower range recommended by the probation department,” which was between thirteen to twenty-six years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43013 - 2009-12-15
for the “lower range recommended by the probation department,” which was between thirteen to twenty-six years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=43013 - 2009-12-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of his probation. Seiler was also facing new criminal charges involving the sexual assault of a minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101818 - 2017-09-21
of his probation. Seiler was also facing new criminal charges involving the sexual assault of a minor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101818 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
La Crosse County Department of Human Services v. Stacey A. M.
to twenty years of probation consecutive to her twenty-two-year prison term. No. 01-1723 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4119 - 2017-09-20
to twenty years of probation consecutive to her twenty-two-year prison term. No. 01-1723 3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4119 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Charles R. C.
, the need to protect Charles’ daughter, the fact that Charles was on probation at the time this offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6975 - 2017-09-20
, the need to protect Charles’ daughter, the fact that Charles was on probation at the time this offense
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6975 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
recommend a withheld sentence with two years of probation, ninety days of conditional jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588824 - 2022-11-10
recommend a withheld sentence with two years of probation, ninety days of conditional jail time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588824 - 2022-11-10