Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13331 - 13340 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13331 - 13340 of 30154 for consulta de causas.
Wisconsin Court System - Third Branch eNews
on topics, such as security screening, protests, de-escalation strategies, and personal safety at home
/news/thirdbranch/apr23/index.htm - 2026-03-28
on topics, such as security screening, protests, de-escalation strategies, and personal safety at home
/news/thirdbranch/apr23/index.htm - 2026-03-28
[PDF]
State v. Shelbie Sue Schultz
are questions of law which this court decides de novo. Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12429 - 2017-09-21
are questions of law which this court decides de novo. Sanchez, 201 Wis.2d at 236-37, 548 N.W.2d at 76
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12429 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a compensable taking occurred in this case. We review summary judgment de novo. Pinter v. American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97222 - 2014-09-15
a compensable taking occurred in this case. We review summary judgment de novo. Pinter v. American Family
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=97222 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Thomas F. Kallenbach
an investigative stop meets statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14607 - 2017-09-21
an investigative stop meets statutory and constitutional standards is a question of law which we review de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14607 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Monika Gasper v. Andrew and Nancy Parbs
requires us to construe WIS. STAT. § 174.02(1)(b) and apply it to undisputed facts. We do this de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3018 - 2017-09-19
requires us to construe WIS. STAT. § 174.02(1)(b) and apply it to undisputed facts. We do this de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3018 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
and substantial breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. A breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28620 - 2007-04-03
and substantial breach of the plea agreement is a question of law that we review de novo. Id. A breach
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28620 - 2007-04-03
Thomas R. Leske v. John A. Leske
, 294 N.W.2d 473, 476-77 (1980), and need not be repeated. We apply the same methodology de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7719 - 2005-03-31
, 294 N.W.2d 473, 476-77 (1980), and need not be repeated. We apply the same methodology de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7719 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
declaration. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53999 - 2010-06-23
declaration. STANDARD OF REVIEW ¶4 This court reviews summary judgment decisions de novo, applying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=53999 - 2010-06-23
State v. Oscar A. Rash
; whether a restitution order comports with the statute, however, is subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5093 - 2005-03-31
; whether a restitution order comports with the statute, however, is subject to our de novo review. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5093 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23
a question of law that this court reviews de novo.” State v. Edwards, 2003 WI 68, ¶7, 262 Wis. 2d 448, 665
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=754710 - 2024-01-23