Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13331 - 13340 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
Search results 13331 - 13340 of 30136 for consulta de causas.
State v. Montrell D. McDade
the defendant to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 McDade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19966 - 2005-10-17
the defendant to relief is a question of law, which we review de novo. Id. ¶12 McDade
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19966 - 2005-10-17
COURT OF APPEALS
, is reviewed de novo. See id. ¶11 A police officer may conduct a traffic stop when, under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39337 - 2009-08-12
, is reviewed de novo. See id. ¶11 A police officer may conduct a traffic stop when, under the totality
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=39337 - 2009-08-12
State v. Michael G. Costigan
facts satisfy the constitutional requirements presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2015-01-07
facts satisfy the constitutional requirements presents a question of law, which we review de novo. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8904 - 2015-01-07
Donahue's Accounting and Tax Service v. Holly Ryno
testimony is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 179-85. ¶7 Ryno’s counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6678 - 2005-03-31
testimony is a question of law which we review de novo. Id. at 179-85. ¶7 Ryno’s counterclaim
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6678 - 2005-03-31
State v. Leonard McDowell
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10418 - 2005-03-31
, if true, would entitle a defendant to relief is a question of law that we review de novo. However
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10418 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
is a question of law subject to de novo review. See City of Muskego v. Godec, 167 Wis. 2d 536, 545, 482 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58236 - 2015-03-02
is a question of law subject to de novo review. See City of Muskego v. Godec, 167 Wis. 2d 536, 545, 482 N.W.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=58236 - 2015-03-02
State v. Donnie Cobbs
a constitutional violation is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Street, 202 Wis.2d 533, 543
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12909 - 2005-10-14
a constitutional violation is a question of law that we review de novo. See State v. Street, 202 Wis.2d 533, 543
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12909 - 2005-10-14
Robin A. Arnold v. John C. Robbins, Jr.
which this court reviews de novo. See Janesville Community Day Care Center, Inc. v. Spoden, 126 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10442 - 2014-02-04
which this court reviews de novo. See Janesville Community Day Care Center, Inc. v. Spoden, 126 Wis.2d
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10442 - 2014-02-04
William E. Hintz v. Greg C. Magnuson
correctly contend, this presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Maxey v. Racine Redev. Auth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12956 - 2007-03-15
correctly contend, this presents a question of law that we review de novo. See Maxey v. Racine Redev. Auth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12956 - 2007-03-15
Pierce County Department of Human Services v. Dawn B.
). This claim is an attack on the trial court’s interpretation of the Children’s Code, and is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12878 - 2005-03-31
). This claim is an attack on the trial court’s interpretation of the Children’s Code, and is reviewed de novo
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12878 - 2005-03-31