Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13331 - 13340 of 20373 for sai.
Search results 13331 - 13340 of 20373 for sai.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED January 31, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Court...
was money or drugs. We cannot say that any of the evidence was inherently or patently incredible. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27966 - 2007-01-30
was money or drugs. We cannot say that any of the evidence was inherently or patently incredible. See
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=27966 - 2007-01-30
State v. Samuel V. Perez
that the interview ended because “we didn’t have anything more to say and there was the determination made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6074 - 2005-03-31
that the interview ended because “we didn’t have anything more to say and there was the determination made
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6074 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. James A. Sybers
COUNSEL: Well, that specific sentence says you’re telling the truth. MR. SYBERS: Telling the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5668 - 2017-09-19
COUNSEL: Well, that specific sentence says you’re telling the truth. MR. SYBERS: Telling the truth
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5668 - 2017-09-19
State v. Cynthia M.
,” and related that Cynthia M. called her one evening to say that she was, as phrased by Jennifer S., “hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19041 - 2005-07-18
,” and related that Cynthia M. called her one evening to say that she was, as phrased by Jennifer S., “hearing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19041 - 2005-07-18
COURT OF APPEALS
. And when you say you didn’t want to go through “that stuff again,” what does that mean? What did you mean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98077 - 2013-06-12
. And when you say you didn’t want to go through “that stuff again,” what does that mean? What did you mean
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=98077 - 2013-06-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. as a “very psychotic man,” including that he was rambling, saying nonsensical things, and exhibiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212218 - 2018-05-01
. as a “very psychotic man,” including that he was rambling, saying nonsensical things, and exhibiting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=212218 - 2018-05-01
[PDF]
State v. Darryl A. Harding
. Unlike the State’s interpretation, these words might well be saying that Engelking had verified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4008 - 2017-09-20
. Unlike the State’s interpretation, these words might well be saying that Engelking had verified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4008 - 2017-09-20
State v. George C. Lohmeier
. This is not to say, however, that negligence by the victim is inadmissible in a criminal prosecution. As discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8028 - 2005-03-31
. This is not to say, however, that negligence by the victim is inadmissible in a criminal prosecution. As discussed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8028 - 2005-03-31
Eugene Hafner v. Wisconsin Department of Revenue
that this provision means what it says—that such an employee no longer has any vested rights in the system
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2304 - 2005-03-31
that this provision means what it says—that such an employee no longer has any vested rights in the system
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2304 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. That is to say, Thomas fails to persuade us that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168400 - 2017-09-21
. That is to say, Thomas fails to persuade us that the circuit court erroneously exercised its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=168400 - 2017-09-21