Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13351 - 13360 of 98376 for circuit court.
Search results 13351 - 13360 of 98376 for circuit court.
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: MITCHELL J. METROPuLoS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2011-02-22
of the circuit court for Outagamie County: MITCHELL J. METROPuLoS, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 HOOVER, P.J.[1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=60101 - 2011-02-22
COURT OF APPEALS
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DANIEL L. KONKOL, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72011 - 2011-10-11
. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: DANIEL L. KONKOL, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=72011 - 2011-10-11
COURT OF APPEALS
from an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County: dale t. pasell, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34867 - 2008-12-10
from an order of the circuit court for La Crosse County: dale t. pasell, Judge. Affirmed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34867 - 2008-12-10
COURT OF APPEALS
of the circuit court for Dane County: steven d. ebert, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Daryl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
of the circuit court for Dane County: steven d. ebert, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 LUNDSTEN, J.[1] Daryl
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30244 - 2007-09-12
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Paul R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51606 - 2010-07-06
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from orders of the circuit court for Milwaukee County: Paul R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=51606 - 2010-07-06
COURT OF APPEALS
on the present appeal. The testimony that is at issue—which the circuit court determined was improperly admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
on the present appeal. The testimony that is at issue—which the circuit court determined was improperly admitted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=48112 - 2010-03-17
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32132 - 2008-03-18
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment and an order of the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32132 - 2008-03-18
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Iowa County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92779 - 2013-02-13
, Defendant-Appellant. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Iowa County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92779 - 2013-02-13
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Polk County: MOLLY E. GALEWYRICK, Judge. Reversed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103082 - 2013-10-14
a judgment of the circuit court for Polk County: MOLLY E. GALEWYRICK, Judge. Reversed. Before
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103082 - 2013-10-14
COURT OF APPEALS
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Burnett County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122262 - 2014-09-22
, Defendant-Respondent. APPEAL from a judgment of the circuit court for Burnett County
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=122262 - 2014-09-22

