Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13351 - 13360 of 46092 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 13351 - 13360 of 46092 for paternity test paper work.
City of West Allis v. C. Scott Radtke
breath test. Radtke took the test, with the result being above the legal limit. Prior to asking Radtke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9757 - 2005-03-31
breath test. Radtke took the test, with the result being above the legal limit. Prior to asking Radtke
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9757 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of West Allis v. C. Scott Radtke
to a chemical breath test. Radtke took the test, with the result being above the legal limit. Prior to asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9757 - 2017-09-19
to a chemical breath test. Radtke took the test, with the result being above the legal limit. Prior to asking
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9757 - 2017-09-19
State v. Daniel R. French
court’s determination that he unreasonably refused to submit to a chemical test; he does not challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6614 - 2005-03-31
court’s determination that he unreasonably refused to submit to a chemical test; he does not challenge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6614 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis M. Stanton
test is a defense to refusing to consent to the test. See § 343.305(9)(a)5.c, Stats. The sole issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11686 - 2005-03-31
test is a defense to refusing to consent to the test. See § 343.305(9)(a)5.c, Stats. The sole issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11686 - 2005-03-31
City of Edgerton v. Robert Naatz
to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him guilty of both charges. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10429 - 2005-03-31
to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him guilty of both charges. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10429 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Edgerton v. Robert Naatz
of Edgerton denied his motion to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10429 - 2017-09-20
of Edgerton denied his motion to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10429 - 2017-09-20
State v. Mark S. Witkowski
refusal to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31
refusal to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31
State v. Stephen Pritchard
to submit to a chemical test in violation of § 343.305, Stats. Pritchard contends that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
to submit to a chemical test in violation of § 343.305, Stats. Pritchard contends that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark S. Witkowski
to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8641 - 2017-09-19
to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8641 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Sturm
are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. No. 03-1944-FT 2 test under WIS. STAT. § 343.305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20
are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. No. 03-1944-FT 2 test under WIS. STAT. § 343.305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20