Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13351 - 13360 of 73032 for we.

Kevin W. McCrary v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
in March 1998, he was not entitled to permanent partial disability. We affirm the order. Statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3926 - 2005-03-31

City of Madison v. Jeffrey Crossfield
the Zoning Board of Appeals. We reject these claims and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5951 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
and Walters, and dismissed Robbins’ petition. Robbins appeals. For the following reasons, we affirm each
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=148002 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of the stop by directing him to exit his vehicle in order to perform field sobriety tests. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783537 - 2024-04-02

[PDF] State v. Bobby D. Arthur
) the trial court’s seventy-five-year sentence was harsh and excessive. We affirm. I. BACKGROUND. ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5284 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] Melvin Kempf v. Michael D. Lilek
for costs and attorney fees alleging the Kempfs’ appeal is frivolous. We determine the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5055 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
discovered evidence. The circuit court denied Bouc’s motion. We affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 On December 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=58051 - 2014-09-15

Insurance Company of North America v. Cease Electric Inc.
erred in refusing to impose sanctions against Cold Spring for its alleged spoliation of evidence. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6267 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 154
) (Dec. 2006), which he asserts compels suppression of the evidence discovered during the search. We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=34133 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
by “a different statute,” thereby failing to produce the file to Jackson. ¶2 We agree with the District Attorney
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=965675 - 2025-06-10