Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13361 - 13370 of 51772 for him.
Search results 13361 - 13370 of 51772 for him.
[PDF]
Frontsheet
in his answer that the OLR had engaged in disparate treatment of him with an intent to injure his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113971 - 2017-09-21
in his answer that the OLR had engaged in disparate treatment of him with an intent to injure his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=113971 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ted W. Urdahl
in this action on the ground that the delay in bringing him to trial violated his right to a speedy trial under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21
in this action on the ground that the delay in bringing him to trial violated his right to a speedy trial under
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19002 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Steven A. Avery
not entitle him to relief. We affirm this further trial court ruling. BACKGROUND On July 29, 1985, P.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11594 - 2017-09-19
not entitle him to relief. We affirm this further trial court ruling. BACKGROUND On July 29, 1985, P.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11594 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
and therefore Ordonia-Roman is entitled to the presumption that counsel’s conflict of interest prejudiced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110156 - 2017-09-21
and therefore Ordonia-Roman is entitled to the presumption that counsel’s conflict of interest prejudiced him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Rex A. Bigger appeals a judgment convicting him, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042989 - 2025-11-25
. RULE 809.23(3). ¶1 PER CURIAM. Rex A. Bigger appeals a judgment convicting him, following
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1042989 - 2025-11-25
[PDF]
) the officer’s testimony violated his right to confront witnesses against him, (2) he did not forfeit his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713493 - 2023-10-12
) the officer’s testimony violated his right to confront witnesses against him, (2) he did not forfeit his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713493 - 2023-10-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of counsel because counsel did not advise him that he could receive the maximum penalty. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448503 - 2021-11-02
of counsel because counsel did not advise him that he could receive the maximum penalty. He further
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448503 - 2021-11-02
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
2004, Jennifer and Dakota moved in with Kevin and remained living with him until July 2005, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70054 - 2014-09-15
2004, Jennifer and Dakota moved in with Kevin and remained living with him until July 2005, when
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=70054 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
him to suffer monetary loss. ¶2 The circuit court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143523 - 2017-09-21
him to suffer monetary loss. ¶2 The circuit court granted the City’s motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=143523 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the No. 2012AP1855-CR 2 circuit court sentenced him to twenty years of initial confinement and fifteen years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104034 - 2017-09-21
the No. 2012AP1855-CR 2 circuit court sentenced him to twenty years of initial confinement and fifteen years
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=104034 - 2017-09-21