Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13361 - 13370 of 74949 for public records.

[PDF] Leopoldo Balderas, Jr. v. City of Milwaukee
unreasonable and the dwelling on the subject premises in their [sic] present state constitute a public
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15581 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that neither claim was supported by the record, and this appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶5 Sentencing lies
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=65051 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] Racine County Department of Human Services v. Stormy W.
in s. 55.01(2) or (5); (continued) No. 01-3029 3 state public defender, was appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4586 - 2017-09-19

CA Blank Order
. After reviewing the record, counsel’s reports, and Thornhill’s response, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120918 - 2014-09-02

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Capps
of the no merit report and the record, we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11931 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Jason L. S.
, because this court concludes that the record contains sufficient evidence to support the trial court's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8716 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we agree with counsel’s assessment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=242538 - 2019-06-19

Racine County Department of Human Services v. Stormy W.
responsibilities. Wis. Stat. § 48.415(3), (6).[2] Attorney Mark Lukoff, assistant state public defender
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4586 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Robert J. Capps
of the no merit report and the record, we conclude that there are no arguable appellate issues. Therefore, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12302 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
determined that neither claim was supported by the record, and this appeal followed. DISCUSSION ¶5
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=65051 - 2011-05-31