Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13361 - 13370 of 63595 for records/1000.
Search results 13361 - 13370 of 63595 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762402 - 2024-02-13
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762402 - 2024-02-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274569 - 2020-08-04
right to respond and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=274569 - 2020-08-04
State v. Tracey T. Williams
According to the criminal complaints and other portions of the records, on July 21, 2001, Williams battered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6242 - 2005-03-31
According to the criminal complaints and other portions of the records, on July 21, 2001, Williams battered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6242 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
stamp. However, as detailed in the postconviction court’s decision, the record copy does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92811 - 2014-09-15
stamp. However, as detailed in the postconviction court’s decision, the record copy does
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92811 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Carl Eichorn v. Coakley Brothers Company
the records of all delivery drivers employed by Coakley … for the past five years, I have determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6011 - 2017-09-19
the records of all delivery drivers employed by Coakley … for the past five years, I have determined
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6011 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919430 - 2025-02-26
review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919430 - 2025-02-26
COURT OF APPEALS
a “serious significant prior criminal record” and had committed a crime that was of an “opportunistic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32449 - 2008-04-15
a “serious significant prior criminal record” and had committed a crime that was of an “opportunistic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32449 - 2008-04-15
[PDF]
Warren Slocum v. Sandra Hohman
pays for the evaluation, denying his request to review the child’s psychological record, requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14644 - 2017-09-21
pays for the evaluation, denying his request to review the child’s psychological record, requiring
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14644 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728217 - 2023-11-14
a response, but he did not do so. Upon this court’s independent review of the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=728217 - 2023-11-14
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and the record, we agree with the assessment of counsel that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=890350 - 2024-12-19
and the record, we agree with the assessment of counsel that there are no arguably meritorious appellate issues
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=890350 - 2024-12-19