Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13361 - 13370 of 58458 for speedy trial.
Search results 13361 - 13370 of 58458 for speedy trial.
State v. Rakhoda Amani Beni
was not provided with a qualified interpreter, as required by Wis. Stat. § 885.38 (2003‑04);[2] that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18450 - 2005-06-06
was not provided with a qualified interpreter, as required by Wis. Stat. § 885.38 (2003‑04);[2] that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18450 - 2005-06-06
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of conviction entered after a bench trial in which the circuit court found him guilty of delivering not more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171258 - 2017-09-21
of conviction entered after a bench trial in which the circuit court found him guilty of delivering not more
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=171258 - 2017-09-21
Kay R. Wichman v. Robert J. Wichman
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it misapplied Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.04(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14863 - 2005-03-31
that the trial court erroneously exercised its discretion when it misapplied Wis. Adm. Code § HSS 80.04(2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14863 - 2005-03-31
State v. Rakhoda Amani Beni
was not provided with a qualified interpreter, as required by Wis. Stat. § 885.38 (2003‑04);[2] that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18445 - 2005-06-06
was not provided with a qualified interpreter, as required by Wis. Stat. § 885.38 (2003‑04);[2] that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18445 - 2005-06-06
COURT OF APPEALS
accident. He raises two issues—(1) whether his right to confrontation was violated when the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95661 - 2013-04-23
accident. He raises two issues—(1) whether his right to confrontation was violated when the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=95661 - 2013-04-23
[PDF]
State v. Michael J. G.
., 1993-94, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Michael contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12753 - 2017-09-21
., 1993-94, and from an order denying his postconviction motion for a new trial. Michael contends
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12753 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Ronald H. Gilpin
L. ABBOTT, Judge. Affirmed. EICH, J.1 Ronald H. Gilpin was convicted, after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14263 - 2014-09-15
L. ABBOTT, Judge. Affirmed. EICH, J.1 Ronald H. Gilpin was convicted, after a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14263 - 2014-09-15
State v. Philip J. Foster
, that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion, and that new factors justify sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14978 - 2005-03-31
, that the trial court erroneously exercised its sentencing discretion, and that new factors justify sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14978 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
)(a) (2019-20).1 Grady also appeals the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motion requesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550082 - 2022-08-02
)(a) (2019-20).1 Grady also appeals the trial court’s denial of his postconviction motion requesting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=550082 - 2022-08-02
State v. Eunice J. Cooper
. BROWN, J. Eunice J. Cooper claims that the trial court erred when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8773 - 2005-03-31
. BROWN, J. Eunice J. Cooper claims that the trial court erred when it refused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8773 - 2005-03-31