Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13381 - 13390 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.
Search results 13381 - 13390 of 46056 for paternity test paper work.
State v. John P. McWilliams
McWilliams agreed at the hospital to submit to a blood sample for a test of his blood-alcohol concentration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6367 - 2005-03-31
McWilliams agreed at the hospital to submit to a blood sample for a test of his blood-alcohol concentration
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6367 - 2005-03-31
City of Edgerton v. Robert Naatz
to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him guilty of both charges. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10429 - 2005-03-31
to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him guilty of both charges. His
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10429 - 2005-03-31
State v. Dennis M. Stanton
test is a defense to refusing to consent to the test. See § 343.305(9)(a)5.c, Stats. The sole issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11686 - 2005-03-31
test is a defense to refusing to consent to the test. See § 343.305(9)(a)5.c, Stats. The sole issue
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11686 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
City of Edgerton v. Robert Naatz
of Edgerton denied his motion to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10429 - 2017-09-20
of Edgerton denied his motion to suppress evidence of his blood alcohol concentration tests and found him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10429 - 2017-09-20
State v. Adam V. Tovsen
suspicion to detain him and administer field sobriety tests. We conclude the officer did, and we therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7077 - 2005-03-31
suspicion to detain him and administer field sobriety tests. We conclude the officer did, and we therefore
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7077 - 2005-03-31
State v. Mark S. Witkowski
refusal to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31
refusal to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8641 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
appeals a judgment convicting him of refusal to take a chemical breath test after an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149183 - 2017-09-21
appeals a judgment convicting him of refusal to take a chemical breath test after an arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=149183 - 2017-09-21
State v. Stephen Pritchard
to submit to a chemical test in violation of § 343.305, Stats. Pritchard contends that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
to submit to a chemical test in violation of § 343.305, Stats. Pritchard contends that the arresting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8478 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark A. Sturm
are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. No. 03-1944-FT 2 test under WIS. STAT. § 343.305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20
are to the 2001-02 version unless otherwise noted. No. 03-1944-FT 2 test under WIS. STAT. § 343.305
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6696 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
State v. Mark S. Witkowski
to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8641 - 2017-09-19
to submit to a chemical test of his breath was unreasonable. We affirm because we conclude that his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8641 - 2017-09-19