Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13391 - 13400 of 91992 for WA 0859 3970 0884 Produsen Karpet Vinyl Rumah 1 Lantai Modern Klasik Daerah Paliyan Gunungkidul.

State v. David W. Oakley
1 PER CURIAM. (on motion for reconsideration). David W. Oakley, defendant-appellant-petitioner
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17588 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Walter L. Merten v. Department of Transportation
. Before Vergeront, Roggensack and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Walter Merten appeals from an order
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2723 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] NOTICE
. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jeremiah Jacob Lambert appeals from an order summarily denying his sentence
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31847 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=107857 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
, Reserve Judge. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Jason Edmonson appeals an order denying his WIS. STAT. § 974.06
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95793 - 2014-09-15

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2023-24).1 We affirm. In September
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980930 - 2025-07-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21(1) (2023-24).1 We affirm. In September
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=980930 - 2025-07-10

[PDF] CA Blank Order
concluding that WIS. STAT. § 939.617 (2015-16) 1 requires that a minimum three-year prison term be imposed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=187053 - 2017-09-21

COURT OF APPEALS
. BISSETT, Judge. Affirmed. ¶1 NEUBAUER, P.J.[1] Eric R. Carley appeals from a judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92582 - 2013-02-12

State v. Steven L. Stoflet
. ROGGENSACK, J.[1] Defendant-Appellant, Steven L. Stoflet (Stoflet), appeals the denial of a motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10548 - 2005-03-31