Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1341 - 1350 of 68466 for did.
Search results 1341 - 1350 of 68466 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
to provide that the lease would terminate at “11:49 a.m. on the first day of November, 2011.” Fiduciary did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75593 - 2011-12-21
to provide that the lease would terminate at “11:49 a.m. on the first day of November, 2011.” Fiduciary did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75593 - 2011-12-21
State v. Larry G. Edwards
on the ground that the State's motion for reconsideration did not raise a "new issue" that was distinct from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16577 - 2005-03-31
on the ground that the State's motion for reconsideration did not raise a "new issue" that was distinct from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16577 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
that the pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he did not properly understand the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29244 - 2007-05-30
that the pleas were not knowingly and voluntarily entered because he did not properly understand the potential
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29244 - 2007-05-30
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
in the name of OWC to take those payments; according to Scherer, the clinic did not use Square, and “that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737449 - 2023-12-06
in the name of OWC to take those payments; according to Scherer, the clinic did not use Square, and “that’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=737449 - 2023-12-06
[PDF]
State v. Neil E. Wakershauser
challenged the validity of both his second and third prior convictions, claiming that he did not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3521 - 2017-09-19
challenged the validity of both his second and third prior convictions, claiming that he did not knowingly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3521 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
NOTICE
these two witnesses at trial was not deficient; therefore, Paine did not receive ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43844 - 2014-09-15
these two witnesses at trial was not deficient; therefore, Paine did not receive ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=43844 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
and failed to request an instruction on a different lesser-included offense. We conclude that Sidoff did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38630 - 2009-07-29
and failed to request an instruction on a different lesser-included offense. We conclude that Sidoff did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=38630 - 2009-07-29
[PDF]
State v. Larry G. Edwards
. The court of appeals dismissed the appeal on the ground that the State's motion for reconsideration did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
. The court of appeals dismissed the appeal on the ground that the State's motion for reconsideration did
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16577 - 2017-09-21
County of Fond du Lac v. Jay D. Graff
On appeal, Graff does not renew his trial court argument that Fabry did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19211 - 2005-07-31
On appeal, Graff does not renew his trial court argument that Fabry did not have reasonable suspicion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19211 - 2005-07-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and voluntarily entered because he did not properly understand the potential maximum penalty. ¶3 The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29244 - 2014-09-15
and voluntarily entered because he did not properly understand the potential maximum penalty. ¶3 The motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=29244 - 2014-09-15