Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1341 - 1350 of 69415 for he.
Search results 1341 - 1350 of 69415 for he.
State v. Frank Penigar, Jr.
a judgment of conviction entered after he pled no contest to a charge of first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
a judgment of conviction entered after he pled no contest to a charge of first-degree intentional homicide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12751 - 2005-03-31
WI App 57 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1862 Complete Title of...
because he did not show that “there would be a different outcome” or that he had “real and viable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110005 - 2014-05-27
because he did not show that “there would be a different outcome” or that he had “real and viable
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=110005 - 2014-05-27
[PDF]
State v. Frank E. Mallett
modification. Mallett argues he is entitled to withdraw his plea because No. 04-0401 2 he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7304 - 2017-09-20
modification. Mallett argues he is entitled to withdraw his plea because No. 04-0401 2 he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7304 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-Lay in March 2018. He then began working full time at Gold Cross Ambulance as an advanced EMT. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292220 - 2020-09-29
-Lay in March 2018. He then began working full time at Gold Cross Ambulance as an advanced EMT. He
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=292220 - 2020-09-29
[PDF]
WI APP 57
error prejudiced his case because he did not show that “there would be a different outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110005 - 2017-09-21
error prejudiced his case because he did not show that “there would be a different outcome
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=110005 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
entered a guilty plea to first-degree reckless homicide. He seeks to withdraw his plea based on claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119176 - 2014-09-15
entered a guilty plea to first-degree reckless homicide. He seeks to withdraw his plea based on claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119176 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
homicide. He seeks to withdraw his plea based on claims that his counsel was ineffective and the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119176 - 2014-08-12
homicide. He seeks to withdraw his plea based on claims that his counsel was ineffective and the plea
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119176 - 2014-08-12
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, as a party to a crime, as a domestic abuser in Milwaukee County case No. 2014CF5487. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249233 - 2019-10-30
, as a party to a crime, as a domestic abuser in Milwaukee County case No. 2014CF5487. He also appeals
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249233 - 2019-10-30
[PDF]
WI APP 56
before he made the incriminating statements he seeks to suppress. Because he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48057 - 2014-09-15
before he made the incriminating statements he seeks to suppress. Because he argues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=48057 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
-CR 2 He also appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125544 - 2017-09-21
-CR 2 He also appeals the trial court’s denial of his motion for postconviction relief
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=125544 - 2017-09-21