Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1341 - 1350 of 12958 for se.
Search results 1341 - 1350 of 12958 for se.
COURT OF APPEALS
that Attorney Harris withdraw as counsel.[2] Brown told the court that he wished to proceed pro se, prompting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59523 - 2011-02-06
that Attorney Harris withdraw as counsel.[2] Brown told the court that he wished to proceed pro se, prompting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=59523 - 2011-02-06
State v. Eddie Lee Quinn
). Quinn asked that he be allowed to proceed pro se because he had a “lack of confidence in court-appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3302 - 2005-03-31
). Quinn asked that he be allowed to proceed pro se because he had a “lack of confidence in court-appointed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3302 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
-delineated exceptions, warrantless searches are deemed per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75747 - 2011-12-27
-delineated exceptions, warrantless searches are deemed per se unreasonable under the Fourth Amendment.” Id
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=75747 - 2011-12-27
[PDF]
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. David H. Schwarz
Mentek's petition for a writ of certiorari, filed pro se on August 24, 1998, 3 alleged numerous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17475 - 2017-09-21
Mentek's petition for a writ of certiorari, filed pro se on August 24, 1998, 3 alleged numerous
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17475 - 2017-09-21
James A. Mentek, Jr. v. David H. Schwarz
of certiorari, filed pro se on August 24, 1998,[3] alleged numerous procedural violations before and during his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17475 - 2005-03-31
of certiorari, filed pro se on August 24, 1998,[3] alleged numerous procedural violations before and during his
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17475 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Alternative Dispute Resolution Report, Revised 9-5-2000
to an appellate decision5. In District I, the local staff attorney screens all docketing statements to se- lect
/publications/reports/docs/adrpilot.pdf - 2006-06-19
to an appellate decision5. In District I, the local staff attorney screens all docketing statements to se- lect
/publications/reports/docs/adrpilot.pdf - 2006-06-19
[PDF]
State v. Victor E. Holm
. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Victor Holm, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20763 - 2017-09-21
. Affirmed. Before Cane, C.J., Hoover, P.J., and Peterson, J. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Victor Holm, pro se
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20763 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Shanee Y. v. Ronnie J.
, 2000, Ronnie made his first pro se request to open the judgments of paternity and for a DNA paternity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6456 - 2017-09-19
, 2000, Ronnie made his first pro se request to open the judgments of paternity and for a DNA paternity
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6456 - 2017-09-19
Shanee Y. v. Ronnie J.
in the judgments of paternity. On December 4, 2000, Ronnie made his first pro se request to open the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6455 - 2005-03-31
in the judgments of paternity. On December 4, 2000, Ronnie made his first pro se request to open the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6455 - 2005-03-31
Shanee Y. v. Ronnie J.
in the judgments of paternity. On December 4, 2000, Ronnie made his first pro se request to open the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6456 - 2005-03-31
in the judgments of paternity. On December 4, 2000, Ronnie made his first pro se request to open the judgments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6456 - 2005-03-31