Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13401 - 13410 of 63595 for records/1000.
Search results 13401 - 13410 of 63595 for records/1000.
State v. Tashonia B.
of the record, this court concludes that the appeal raises no issue of arguable merit. Therefore, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12320 - 2005-03-31
of the record, this court concludes that the appeal raises no issue of arguable merit. Therefore, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12320 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140294 - 2015-04-20
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140294 - 2015-04-20
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
conviction from December 1986. At Webster’s plea hearing, the State introduced a record of the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21
conviction from December 1986. At Webster’s plea hearing, the State introduced a record of the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13368 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Brandon K. Dittberner
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13219 - 2017-09-21
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders, we conclude that there is no arguable merit to any
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13219 - 2017-09-21
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
that the sentencing record reflected a lack of reasoning for imposing a consecutive sentence and for declaring her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
that the sentencing record reflected a lack of reasoning for imposing a consecutive sentence and for declaring her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=19967 - 2005-10-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122148 - 2014-09-23
review of the briefs and record, we conclude that this case is appropriate for summary disposition
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=122148 - 2014-09-23
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016930 - 2025-09-30
not responded. We have independently reviewed the record and the no-merit report
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1016930 - 2025-09-30
State v. Peter C. Ramuta
-established case law that allows a court to make a sufficient record by demonstrating that the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5603 - 2005-03-31
-established case law that allows a court to make a sufficient record by demonstrating that the defendant has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5603 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791217 - 2024-04-23
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=791217 - 2024-04-23
CA Blank Order
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141632 - 2015-05-10
and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. We reject
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=141632 - 2015-05-10