Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13401 - 13410 of 73027 for we.
Search results 13401 - 13410 of 73027 for we.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by wrongdoing. We conclude that the trial court’s decision to admit this statement was within its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640910 - 2023-04-04
by wrongdoing. We conclude that the trial court’s decision to admit this statement was within its discretion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=640910 - 2023-04-04
State v. Bobby D. Arthur
) the trial court’s seventy-five-year sentence was harsh and excessive. We affirm. I. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5284 - 2005-03-31
) the trial court’s seventy-five-year sentence was harsh and excessive. We affirm. I. Background
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5284 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
and by failing to investigate and impeach certain State witnesses. We disagree and affirm the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82152 - 2012-05-07
and by failing to investigate and impeach certain State witnesses. We disagree and affirm the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=82152 - 2012-05-07
[PDF]
Melvin Kempf v. Michael D. Lilek
for costs and attorney fees alleging the Kempfs’ appeal is frivolous. We determine the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5055 - 2017-09-19
for costs and attorney fees alleging the Kempfs’ appeal is frivolous. We determine the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5055 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
reasons, we affirm each decision. BACKGROUND ¶3 After one of her sons died in an accident in 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148002 - 2015-09-02
reasons, we affirm each decision. BACKGROUND ¶3 After one of her sons died in an accident in 1995
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=148002 - 2015-09-02
2008 WI APP 154
of the evidence discovered during the search. We reject each of Jones’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14
of the evidence discovered during the search. We reject each of Jones’s arguments and affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=34133 - 2011-06-14
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
newly discovered evidence. We conclude Knight is not entitled to relief on any of his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729163 - 2023-11-15
newly discovered evidence. We conclude Knight is not entitled to relief on any of his claims
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=729163 - 2023-11-15
[PDF]
State v. William E. Marberry
after his “initial commitment,” which he asserts occurred in November 1996. We conclude that the six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14594 - 2017-09-21
after his “initial commitment,” which he asserts occurred in November 1996. We conclude that the six
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14594 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Jo-El Hanson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Company
instructed the jury. ¶2 We conclude that when we apply the substantive law previously established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20171 - 2017-09-21
instructed the jury. ¶2 We conclude that when we apply the substantive law previously established
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20171 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of the stop by directing him to exit his vehicle in order to perform field sobriety tests. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783537 - 2024-04-02
of the stop by directing him to exit his vehicle in order to perform field sobriety tests. We reject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=783537 - 2024-04-02