Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13421 - 13430 of 20381 for sai.

COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED February 21, 2007 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cour...
didn’t say anything additionally at that point. And I think then on redirect you went back and addressed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28196 - 2007-02-20

[PDF] Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Walter A. Paget
and thereafter Paget refused Baez's offer to him to "save" money for him. Paget says he told Baez to keep
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16552 - 2017-09-21

Jan Raz v. Mary Brown
, and although his arguments were ultimately determined by us to be without merit, we cannot say that his cross
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4370 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
that the plea colloquy was deficient.” We read the court’s decision to say that even if the plea colloquy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=49474 - 2010-04-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
could hear him say something about the person’s speed to the defendant, who was exiting the vehicle
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=135507 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] State v. Joshua T. Howard
, the State argues: [A]lthough the court did not expressly say it disbelieved juror Shibilski, it did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6577 - 2017-09-19

State v. Leon J. Lace
Rhodes” at 2829 North 49th Street, the female who answered the door refused delivery, saying that nobody
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3940 - 2005-03-31

State v. John F. Braz
is well known, and we will not repeat it in detail here. Suffice it to say that Braz’s burden
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2689 - 2005-03-31

2007 WI App 40
support is based on 17%” of Allen’s income; it does not say, as the trial court concluded, that child
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28106 - 2007-03-27

State v. Elizabeth Mata
on probation for twenty years. We cannot say that the trial court’s imposition of ten years is so excessive
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3142 - 2005-03-31