Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13421 - 13430 of 73030 for we.
Search results 13421 - 13430 of 73030 for we.
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Upon review, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Lacina was hired as a Milwaukee Police Department (MPD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078803 - 2026-02-17
. Upon review, we affirm. BACKGROUND ¶2 Lacina was hired as a Milwaukee Police Department (MPD
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1078803 - 2026-02-17
[PDF]
Frontsheet
medication. 2 This court granted the petition, bypassing the court of appeals. ¶3 We reverse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214547 - 2018-08-08
medication. 2 This court granted the petition, bypassing the court of appeals. ¶3 We reverse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214547 - 2018-08-08
[PDF]
NOTICE
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Because we conclude that Ankebrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30049 - 2014-09-15
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Because we conclude that Ankebrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30049 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
since he was not in custody while released on bond to home detention with electronic monitoring. We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17390 - 2017-09-21
since he was not in custody while released on bond to home detention with electronic monitoring. We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17390 - 2017-09-21
2006 WI APP 231
on improper and inaccurate information when imposing his sentence. ¶2 We conclude that Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26678 - 2006-11-20
on improper and inaccurate information when imposing his sentence. ¶2 We conclude that Wis. Stat
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26678 - 2006-11-20
2010 WI APP 27
as well. We conclude that the only issue properly raised here is whether the arbitrator acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44735 - 2011-02-07
as well. We conclude that the only issue properly raised here is whether the arbitrator acted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=44735 - 2011-02-07
Brown County v. Shannon R.
it refused to admit a psychologist’s testimony.[2] We disagree and affirm the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7516 - 2005-03-31
it refused to admit a psychologist’s testimony.[2] We disagree and affirm the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7516 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unknowing, unintelligent, and involuntary. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713527 - 2023-10-11
unknowing, unintelligent, and involuntary. For the reasons discussed below, we affirm the judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=713527 - 2023-10-11
Milwaukee Police Association v. Nannette H. Hegerty
court, which had ruled in favor of the petitioners.[1] In this case we must determine whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16821 - 2005-03-31
court, which had ruled in favor of the petitioners.[1] In this case we must determine whether
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16821 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
by the circuit court. As we explain below, we conclude that Orr is not entitled to a new trial, a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072923 - 2026-02-04
by the circuit court. As we explain below, we conclude that Orr is not entitled to a new trial, a new
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1072923 - 2026-02-04