Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13431 - 13440 of 68502 for did.
Search results 13431 - 13440 of 68502 for did.
State v. Eric Jason Smiley
, the defense presented a theory of self-defense. Smiley did not testify on his own behalf because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3586 - 2005-03-31
, the defense presented a theory of self-defense. Smiley did not testify on his own behalf because his trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3586 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 50
. We hold that the grandparents did not rebut the presumption that the decision of the mother, a fit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28184 - 2007-03-27
. We hold that the grandparents did not rebut the presumption that the decision of the mother, a fit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=28184 - 2007-03-27
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of a child set forth in count one; and that the two crimes did not each require proof of a fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555149 - 2022-08-16
of a child set forth in count one; and that the two crimes did not each require proof of a fact
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=555149 - 2022-08-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of initial confinement for count one, explaining that it did not apply. The court commissioner deferred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134041 - 2017-09-21
of initial confinement for count one, explaining that it did not apply. The court commissioner deferred
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=134041 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gregory J. Dull
releasable and did not have to be removed from what was clearly his home.” Gregory contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10981 - 2017-09-19
releasable and did not have to be removed from what was clearly his home.” Gregory contends that the trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10981 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
Flannery appeared pro se and Henning did not appear. The court explained to Flannery: “Ms. Henning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112743 - 2017-09-21
Flannery appeared pro se and Henning did not appear. The court explained to Flannery: “Ms. Henning
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=112743 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
then fled the scene. ¶9 Although McCall did not see Grant shoot D.P., he knew Grant to have a sawed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343900 - 2021-03-09
then fled the scene. ¶9 Although McCall did not see Grant shoot D.P., he knew Grant to have a sawed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=343900 - 2021-03-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to $3,008,142. Follett did not respond to this notice, and work continued for several months. Follett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83028 - 2014-09-15
to $3,008,142. Follett did not respond to this notice, and work continued for several months. Follett
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=83028 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED September 20, 2011 A. John Voelker Acting Clerk of Cou...
, particularly during closing argument. Deal argues that he was prejudiced because the jury did not hear how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71073 - 2011-09-19
, particularly during closing argument. Deal argues that he was prejudiced because the jury did not hear how
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=71073 - 2011-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
appeared pro se and Henning did not appear. The court explained to Flannery: “Ms. Henning hasn’t appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112743 - 2014-05-21
appeared pro se and Henning did not appear. The court explained to Flannery: “Ms. Henning hasn’t appeared
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=112743 - 2014-05-21