Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13431 - 13440 of 81625 for simple case.
Search results 13431 - 13440 of 81625 for simple case.
COURT OF APPEALS
court pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 102.29(1) (2011-12),[1] to compel settlement of the case on Northland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93778 - 2013-03-06
court pursuant to Wis. Stat. § 102.29(1) (2011-12),[1] to compel settlement of the case on Northland’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=93778 - 2013-03-06
[PDF]
State v. Maxie W. Harvey, Jr.
misdemeanor cases), contends the trial court erred when it refused to grant him a new trial because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14461 - 2017-09-21
misdemeanor cases), contends the trial court erred when it refused to grant him a new trial because our
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14461 - 2017-09-21
Arthur Robert Petrie v. Board of Bar Examiners
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-2414-BA Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17297 - 2005-03-31
SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN Case No.: 97-2414-BA Complete Title of Case
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17297 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
with jurisdiction to try a case, the defendant shall be informed that he or she is entitled to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603258 - 2022-12-21
with jurisdiction to try a case, the defendant shall be informed that he or she is entitled to a jury trial
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=603258 - 2022-12-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101156 - 2017-09-21
that this case is appropriate for summary disposition. See WIS. STAT. RULE 809.21 (2011-12). 1 We summarily
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101156 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Guy S. Ruppenthal
as witnesses in OWI cases. As noted, the letter lobbied for adoption of a local rule which would permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14215 - 2014-09-15
as witnesses in OWI cases. As noted, the letter lobbied for adoption of a local rule which would permit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14215 - 2014-09-15
State v. Levelt D. Musgraves
. This case was here once before. Musgraves claimed that the trial court, the Honorable Jeffrey A. Wagner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9121 - 2005-03-31
. This case was here once before. Musgraves claimed that the trial court, the Honorable Jeffrey A. Wagner
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9121 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
(1) to notify him of the State’s pretrial offer1 and (2) to properly investigate the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92944 - 2014-09-15
(1) to notify him of the State’s pretrial offer1 and (2) to properly investigate the case
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92944 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to Horton after his case concluded, failing to argue a suppression motion, and failing to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76949 - 2014-09-15
to Horton after his case concluded, failing to argue a suppression motion, and failing to investigate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=76949 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Town of Waukesha v. City of Waukesha
court decided the case on summary judgment and concluded that there were no material factual issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4589 - 2017-09-19
court decided the case on summary judgment and concluded that there were no material factual issues
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4589 - 2017-09-19