Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13431 - 13440 of 58245 for speedy trial.

State v. Kurt J. Doerr
thoroughly read the record and find no evidence that he raised these precise issues before the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13709 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] State v. Gary L. Janda
include it in our consideration of the record. ¶6 Although sentencing is within the trial court’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2387 - 2017-09-19

State v. Thomas C. Holden
drug offender. He also appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial based on newly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11183 - 2005-03-31

State v. Christopher D. Laurin
the case can be resolved on another basis—one which the trial court touched upon as a ground for denying
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2507 - 2005-03-31

Chris Marceau v. Wild Life Unlimited Foundation, Inc.
claims the trial court erred in awarding Marceau his wage claim because another entity was in fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5193 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. § 974.06 (2015-16) 1 postconviction motion alleging that trial counsel was ineffective for failing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=216486 - 2018-08-01

[PDF] Thomas Krueger v. Otis Elevator
contends that the trial court erred when it concluded that he was required to name an expert witness
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8562 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Eugene Nichols
to §§ 943.20(1)(a), 943.20(3)(a), 943.11, 943.01 and 939.05, STATS. He claims that the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10743 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] Ted Beckingham v. John Randolph Myers, M.D.
appeals a trial court judgment finding that Dr. John Myers was not negligent in treating Beckingham's
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10519 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] s. Tony Merriweather v. Gerald Berge
, officials of the Department of Corrections (DOC), in contempt. The issue is whether the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6855 - 2017-09-20