Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13431 - 13440 of 19294 for transfer by affidavit.
Search results 13431 - 13440 of 19294 for transfer by affidavit.
State v. Joseph C. Jansen
use and delivery, and is based on the facts set forth in the affidavit, including Jansen’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2924 - 2005-03-31
use and delivery, and is based on the facts set forth in the affidavit, including Jansen’s statement
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2924 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Didion, Inc. v. Ervin Prohaska
the purchase of produce from Prohaska. Didion submitted an affidavit by the agent which stated that she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13348 - 2017-09-21
the purchase of produce from Prohaska. Didion submitted an affidavit by the agent which stated that she had
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13348 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
alleged in an affidavit that he entered his guilty plea only because his trial counsel “promised [Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114894 - 2014-06-23
alleged in an affidavit that he entered his guilty plea only because his trial counsel “promised [Williams
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=114894 - 2014-06-23
[PDF]
State v. Bryon P. Cibrario
. In his affidavit in support of his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal, Cibrario states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26279 - 2017-09-21
. In his affidavit in support of his postconviction motion for plea withdrawal, Cibrario states
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26279 - 2017-09-21
State v. James J. Peckham
to conduct an evidentiary hearing. Peckham failed to file an affidavit attesting that he wanted to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5318 - 2005-03-31
to conduct an evidentiary hearing. Peckham failed to file an affidavit attesting that he wanted to testify
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5318 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the supporting affidavit included the toxicology screen results.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52377 - 2010-07-19
the supporting affidavit included the toxicology screen results.
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=52377 - 2010-07-19
State v. Vincent Konrad Knox
; and, as they pointed out in their affidavit, he also paid bonuses or incentives for bringing in absentee ballots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20880 - 2006-01-16
; and, as they pointed out in their affidavit, he also paid bonuses or incentives for bringing in absentee ballots
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20880 - 2006-01-16
[PDF]
Albert C. Dibbles v. Trygve A. Solberg
, together with the affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4077 - 2017-09-20
, together with the affidavits, if any, show there is no genuine issue as to any material fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4077 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
Steven C. Deiss v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh
examine the moving parties’ affidavits and supporting documents to determine whether that party has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15447 - 2017-09-21
examine the moving parties’ affidavits and supporting documents to determine whether that party has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15447 - 2017-09-21
State v. John A. Clements
in Clements’ affidavit. That single sentence does not come close to apprising the trial judge of the argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2734 - 2005-03-31
in Clements’ affidavit. That single sentence does not come close to apprising the trial judge of the argument
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2734 - 2005-03-31