Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13441 - 13450 of 30134 for consulta de causas.

Kenneth P. Mader v. Community Credit Plan, Inc.
for lack of jurisdiction is a question of law subject to de novo review. See State ex rel. R.G. v. W.M.B
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13386 - 2005-03-31

Kraemer Brothers, Inc. v. Dane County
, the trial court undertakes a de novo review, and may substitute its judgment for that of the custodian
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14692 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] WI APP 52
, 154– 155, 822 N.W.2d 885, 890–891. We decide de novo the legal issue of whether those findings
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=94202 - 2014-09-15

State v. Timothy Scott Bailey Smith, Sr.
. Determining the statutory elements of a crime presents a question of law which we review de novo. State v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6621 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
for more money. ¶6 On October 8, 2008, the trial court heard Schroeder’s motion for de novo review
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120146 - 2014-08-25

[PDF] State v. Victor Marshall Kennedy
testimony about the lighting conditions on the night of the shooting is de minimis. Thus, Kennedy has
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7092 - 2017-09-20

U.S. Bank National Association v. City of Milwaukee
review is de novo. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364–365, 560 N.W.2d 315, 317 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6279 - 2005-03-31

State v. David C. Polashek
of law subject to our de novo review. See Truttschel v. Martin, 208 Wis. 2d 361, 364-65, 560 N.W.2d 315
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2686 - 2005-03-31

State v. Joseph W. Perry
are largely undisputed. His claim, therefore, raises a question of law which we review de novo. Minuteman
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12259 - 2005-03-31

Naomi Anderson v. Con/Spec Corporation
, it was entitled to JNOV. We review de novo a trial court's denial of a motion for JNOV
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11650 - 2005-03-31