Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13441 - 13450 of 63595 for records/1000.
Search results 13441 - 13450 of 63595 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
issues. This court reviewed the report, the response, and the record and concluded that there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26811 - 2006-10-16
issues. This court reviewed the report, the response, and the record and concluded that there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26811 - 2006-10-16
Darrell E. Beth v. Margaret R. Beth
.2d 97, 102 (Ct. App. 1988). We assume that the record supports the trial court’s findings regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12340 - 2005-03-31
.2d 97, 102 (Ct. App. 1988). We assume that the record supports the trial court’s findings regarding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12340 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
not responded. Upon this court’s independent review of the record, as mandated by Anders
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=878081 - 2024-11-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not done so. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459687 - 2021-12-07
not done so. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=459687 - 2021-12-07
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94475 - 2013-03-26
and an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we summarily affirm the judgment
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=94475 - 2013-03-26
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
the scene matched database records for Profit. ¶3 At the arraignment, Profit’s attorney advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95542 - 2014-09-15
the scene matched database records for Profit. ¶3 At the arraignment, Profit’s attorney advised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=95542 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
Arthur D. Dyer v. Rosemarie Annonson
is discernable in the record.” She is mistaken, and the mistake seems to stem from her misunderstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8967 - 2017-09-19
is discernable in the record.” She is mistaken, and the mistake seems to stem from her misunderstanding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8967 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the report, and he has not responded. Based upon an independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598319 - 2022-12-06
to the report, and he has not responded. Based upon an independent review of the records as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598319 - 2022-12-06
CA Blank Order
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138475 - 2015-03-24
not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=138475 - 2015-03-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=480703 - 2022-02-08
to the no-merit report, and he has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=480703 - 2022-02-08