Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13451 - 13460 of 64762 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 13451 - 13460 of 64762 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the appellate record, we conclude this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255302 - 2020-02-25
upon our review of the parties’ briefs and the appellate record, we conclude this appeal
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255302 - 2020-02-25
COURT OF APPEALS
for photographs of the victim’s injuries and inquired about Rivera’s prior record from Illinois. The prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103931 - 2013-11-12
for photographs of the victim’s injuries and inquired about Rivera’s prior record from Illinois. The prosecutor
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=103931 - 2013-11-12
CA Blank Order
, Rodriguez’s response, and after an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105581 - 2013-12-17
, Rodriguez’s response, and after an independent review of the record as mandated by Anders and Rule 809.32, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=105581 - 2013-12-17
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2013AP2332-NM 2 counsel. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131966 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2013AP2332-NM 2 counsel. Upon our independent review of the record, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=131966 - 2017-09-21
State v. James R. Bolstad
. Based upon our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8482 - 2005-03-31
. Based upon our independent review of the record as required by Anders, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=8482 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
at a suppression motion hearing. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144642 - 2015-07-14
at a suppression motion hearing. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report and response, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=144642 - 2015-07-14
COURT OF APPEALS
that the court award of $10,000 to Phalin for damages was not supported by the record and that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146650 - 2015-08-19
that the court award of $10,000 to Phalin for damages was not supported by the record and that the court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=146650 - 2015-08-19
[PDF]
State v. James H.
or to any of the parties.” Based on this statutory language, together with the record facts, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4965 - 2017-09-19
or to any of the parties.” Based on this statutory language, together with the record facts, we conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4965 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189050 - 2017-09-21
, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189050 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Reginald Lamon McDaniel
of trial counsel. Because the record before us defeats McDaniel’s claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18077 - 2017-09-21
of trial counsel. Because the record before us defeats McDaniel’s claim of ineffective assistance
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=18077 - 2017-09-21