Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13451 - 13460 of 73027 for we.
Search results 13451 - 13460 of 73027 for we.
[PDF]
WI APP 97
to the United States Constitution and article I, section 25 of the Wisconsin Constitution. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155961 - 2017-09-21
to the United States Constitution and article I, section 25 of the Wisconsin Constitution. We agree
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155961 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
since he was not in custody while released on bond to home detention with electronic monitoring. We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17390 - 2017-09-21
since he was not in custody while released on bond to home detention with electronic monitoring. We
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17390 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
classification. The agricultural classification results in lower assessments. We conclude that the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92269 - 2014-09-15
classification. The agricultural classification results in lower assessments. We conclude that the Board’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92269 - 2014-09-15
3303-05 Marina Road v. Zennett Properties
We consolidate the appeals for dispositional purposes only and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.10(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26510 - 2006-09-18
We consolidate the appeals for dispositional purposes only and affirm. See Wis. Stat. Rule 809.10(3
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26510 - 2006-09-18
COURT OF APPEALS
discovery obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Wis. Stat. § 971.23 (2011-12).[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130933 - 2014-12-01
discovery obligations under Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83 (1963) and Wis. Stat. § 971.23 (2011-12).[1] We
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=130933 - 2014-12-01
COURT OF APPEALS
for an agricultural use classification. The agricultural classification results in lower assessments. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92269 - 2013-01-30
for an agricultural use classification. The agricultural classification results in lower assessments. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=92269 - 2013-01-30
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
with electronic monitoring. We determine that an offender’s status constitutes custody for sentence credit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17390 - 2005-03-31
with electronic monitoring. We determine that an offender’s status constitutes custody for sentence credit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17390 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Shannon R.
it refused to admit a psychologist’s testimony.[2] We disagree and affirm the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7517 - 2005-03-31
it refused to admit a psychologist’s testimony.[2] We disagree and affirm the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7517 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
WI APP 231
imposing his sentence. ¶2 We conclude that WIS. STAT. §§ 302.05(3)(a)1. and 973.01(3g) do not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26678 - 2014-09-15
imposing his sentence. ¶2 We conclude that WIS. STAT. §§ 302.05(3)(a)1. and 973.01(3g) do not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26678 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Margaret H.
of discretion. We agree with Margaret H.'s contentions. However, because we conclude that the case must
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17525 - 2017-09-21
of discretion. We agree with Margaret H.'s contentions. However, because we conclude that the case must
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17525 - 2017-09-21