Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13461 - 13470 of 30150 for consulta de causas.

Wisconsin Department of Health & Family Services v. Patricia J.G.
of law that we decide de novo. State v. Tammy F., 196 Wis.2d 981, 987, 539 N.W.2d 475, 477 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12394 - 2005-03-31

Clarice Baldwin as Personal Representative of the Estate of Jerry Baldwin v.
of summary judgment is de novo. Groom v. Professionals Ins. Co., 179 Wis. 2d 241, 246, 507 N.W.2d 121 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5221 - 2005-03-31

Kristen Zehner v. Village of Marshall
, 2005 WI 123, 284 Wis. 2d 307, 700 N.W.2d 180: We review de novo the circuit court’s dismissal
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20565 - 2006-01-24

[PDF] State v. Ibrahim Begicevic
review probable cause under a de novo standard of review. County of Jefferson v. Renz, 231 Wis. 2d 293
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6454 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
de novo, we refer only to DHA’s decision in our discussion. ¶8 We are required to affirm DHA’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=194087 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Orion Flight Services, Inc. v. Basler Flight Service
this issue de novo. Williams v. Security Sav. & Loan Ass’n, 120 Wis. 2d 480, 482, 355 N.W.2d 370 (Ct. App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6631 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
of summary judgment de novo, using the same methodology employed by the circuit court. Bank of N.Y. Mellon
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=654431 - 2023-05-11

[PDF] Nicholas C. L. v. Julie R. L.
erroneous, and questions of law are reviewed de novo. WIS. STAT. § 805.17(2); Abbas v. Palmersheim, 2004
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=25085 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
uphold the trial court’s findings of fact unless they are clearly erroneous, but review de novo whether
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92734 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
are questions of law” and our review is de novo. Anderson, 291 Wis. 2d 673, ¶37 (footnote omitted). ¶12
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29129 - 2007-05-21