Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13461 - 13470 of 68326 for did.
Search results 13461 - 13470 of 68326 for did.
COURT OF APPEALS
, arguing that the disciplinary hearing officer did not follow the correct procedure for using CI statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90134 - 2012-12-05
, arguing that the disciplinary hearing officer did not follow the correct procedure for using CI statements
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=90134 - 2012-12-05
[PDF]
State v. Randolph S. Guenterberg
-4- Rehrauer testified that at no time when he spoke to Guenterberg did he threaten him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9030 - 2017-09-19
-4- Rehrauer testified that at no time when he spoke to Guenterberg did he threaten him
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9030 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joseph Eckstein
The State entered transcripts from the police recording of that same conversation into evidence but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5713 - 2017-09-19
The State entered transcripts from the police recording of that same conversation into evidence but did
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5713 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
, Gourdine asked Carlson if J.R. “had taken something.” Carlson replied that he did not know. J.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=577069 - 2022-10-12
, Gourdine asked Carlson if J.R. “had taken something.” Carlson replied that he did not know. J.R
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=577069 - 2022-10-12
[PDF]
State v. Stephen P. Gautschi
, it did not prejudice Gautschi. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16231 - 2017-09-21
, it did not prejudice Gautschi. Accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s order. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=16231 - 2017-09-21
Frontsheet
to represent S.H. for a one-third contingency fee. Attorney Wood did not provide S.H. with a written fee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124799 - 2014-10-20
to represent S.H. for a one-third contingency fee. Attorney Wood did not provide S.H. with a written fee
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=124799 - 2014-10-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of a violation of law to justify” his seizure and “did not have probable cause to make a warrantless arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213627 - 2018-05-31
of a violation of law to justify” his seizure and “did not have probable cause to make a warrantless arrest
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=213627 - 2018-05-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. § 806.23 to bring the action on the 1999 judgment because Carroll did not serve the petition on Sarko
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349439 - 2021-03-25
. § 806.23 to bring the action on the 1999 judgment because Carroll did not serve the petition on Sarko
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=349439 - 2021-03-25
COURT OF APPEALS
indicated he did not specifically argue the lesser-included offenses in his closing argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30926 - 2007-11-19
indicated he did not specifically argue the lesser-included offenses in his closing argument because he
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30926 - 2007-11-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
scheduled and did not receive the State’s subpoena.” Over defense counsel’s objection, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988747 - 2025-07-29
scheduled and did not receive the State’s subpoena.” Over defense counsel’s objection, the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=988747 - 2025-07-29