Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13461 - 13470 of 63980 for records/1000.
Search results 13461 - 13470 of 63980 for records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. 2024AP102-CRNM 2024AP103-CRNM 2 Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909870 - 2025-02-04
. 2024AP102-CRNM 2024AP103-CRNM 2 Upon this court’s independent review of the record as mandated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=909870 - 2025-02-04
State v. David J. Cee
, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11668 - 2005-03-31
, and an independent review of the record, we conclude there is no arguable merit to any issue that could be raised
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11668 - 2005-03-31
Carl Eichorn v. Coakley Brothers Company
of its motion, James Radke, an employee, declared in an affidavit: (1) “[a]fter reviewing the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6011 - 2005-03-31
of its motion, James Radke, an employee, declared in an affidavit: (1) “[a]fter reviewing the records
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6011 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Dawn L. Sanders
sentencing hearing, arguing that the sentencing record reflected a lack of reasoning for imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19967 - 2017-09-21
sentencing hearing, arguing that the sentencing record reflected a lack of reasoning for imposing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=19967 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
a “serious significant prior criminal record” and had committed a crime that was of an “opportunistic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32449 - 2008-04-15
a “serious significant prior criminal record” and had committed a crime that was of an “opportunistic
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32449 - 2008-04-15
CA Blank Order
consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96877 - 2013-05-21
consideration of these submissions and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=96877 - 2013-05-21
Dennis A. Graham v. Labor and Industry Review Commission
. The evidentiary record, however, does not support Graham's belief. The plant supervisor testified that another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9215 - 2005-03-31
. The evidentiary record, however, does not support Graham's belief. The plant supervisor testified that another
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9215 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Donald E. Stoetzel v. City of New Berlin
of the alleged inadequate time period. Next, Stoetzel argues that records of the emergency room physician
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8476 - 2017-09-19
of the alleged inadequate time period. Next, Stoetzel argues that records of the emergency room physician
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=8476 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140529 - 2017-09-21
review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case is appropriate for summary
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=140529 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Patrick C. Webster
conviction from December 1986. At Webster’s plea hearing, the State introduced a record of the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13366 - 2017-09-21
conviction from December 1986. At Webster’s plea hearing, the State introduced a record of the Wisconsin
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13366 - 2017-09-21