Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13461 - 13470 of 83431 for simple case search.

State v. Jose Lomeli-Lozano
and Behavioral Medicine, examined Lozano and reviewed the complaint and other case history. Dr. Alvarez
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=20800 - 2005-12-27

State v. Steven J. Reinhardt
, even though he had searched for them. ¶5 The State outlined the evidence against Reinhardt
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2978 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
investigation that culminated in the seizure of his laptop pursuant to a search warrant. At Kent’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=372454 - 2021-06-02

[PDF] Michael W. Stockton v. William C. Haselow, M.D.
at Michael’s house (where he observed the wound and searched for the glass which might have caused
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3551 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court dismiss the case and refer the matter for a DPA. The motion noted that James was sixteen
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=800910 - 2024-05-14

[PDF] State v. Jose Lomeli-Lozano
and reviewed the complaint and other case history. Dr. Alvarez concluded that Lozano suffered from mild
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=20800 - 2017-09-21

CA Blank Order
was released on bond in this matter, he was arrested and charged in Milwaukee County Circuit Court case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=111898 - 2014-05-04

[PDF] Frontsheet
2017 WI 58 SUPREME COURT OF WISCONSIN CASE NO.: 2014AP2701-CR COMPLETE TITLE
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191608 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Medical Educational Services, Inc. v. Health Education Network, L.L.C.
was not recorded, the court ruled that "that is not a proper measure of damages in this case, because, according
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12367 - 2017-09-21

Medical Educational Services, Inc. v. Health Education Network, L.L.C.
measure of damages in this case, because, according to the ruling with regard to discovery, it’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12367 - 2005-03-31