Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13461 - 13470 of 73010 for we.
Search results 13461 - 13470 of 73010 for we.
State v. Paul E. Magnuson
with electronic monitoring. We determine that an offender’s status constitutes custody for sentence credit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17390 - 2005-03-31
with electronic monitoring. We determine that an offender’s status constitutes custody for sentence credit
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17390 - 2005-03-31
Brown County v. Shannon R.
it refused to admit a psychologist’s testimony.[2] We disagree and affirm the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7517 - 2005-03-31
it refused to admit a psychologist’s testimony.[2] We disagree and affirm the orders. BACKGROUND ¶2
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7517 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Because we conclude that Ankebrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30049 - 2014-09-15
from an order denying his motion for postconviction relief. Because we conclude that Ankebrant
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30049 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
WI APP 231
imposing his sentence. ¶2 We conclude that WIS. STAT. §§ 302.05(3)(a)1. and 973.01(3g) do not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26678 - 2014-09-15
imposing his sentence. ¶2 We conclude that WIS. STAT. §§ 302.05(3)(a)1. and 973.01(3g) do not violate
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26678 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Margaret H.
of discretion. We agree with Margaret H.'s contentions. However, because we conclude that the case must
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17525 - 2017-09-21
of discretion. We agree with Margaret H.'s contentions. However, because we conclude that the case must
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17525 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Frontsheet
medication. 2 This court granted the petition, bypassing the court of appeals. ¶3 We reverse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214547 - 2018-08-08
medication. 2 This court granted the petition, bypassing the court of appeals. ¶3 We reverse
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=214547 - 2018-08-08
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
of Monn was lawful, we agree that her seizure lasted longer than was necessary to effectuate its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285761 - 2020-09-09
of Monn was lawful, we agree that her seizure lasted longer than was necessary to effectuate its
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=285761 - 2020-09-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
to cause that patient bodily harm in violation of that statute. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286064 - 2020-09-09
to cause that patient bodily harm in violation of that statute. We agree. Accordingly, we reverse
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=286064 - 2020-09-09
Richard G. Scullion and Teresa Scullion v. Wisconsin Power & Light Company
, Teresa Scullion, cross-appeal the jury’s finding that they were contributorily negligent. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14768 - 2005-03-31
, Teresa Scullion, cross-appeal the jury’s finding that they were contributorily negligent. We conclude
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14768 - 2005-03-31
Edwin C. West v. Phil Macht
in the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions and Wis. Stat. § 51.61(1)(u) (1997-98).[1] We agree with West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15699 - 2005-03-31
in the United States and Wisconsin Constitutions and Wis. Stat. § 51.61(1)(u) (1997-98).[1] We agree with West
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15699 - 2005-03-31