Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13471 - 13480 of 65680 for divorce records/1000.
Search results 13471 - 13480 of 65680 for divorce records/1000.
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576898 - 2022-10-11
upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=576898 - 2022-10-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189004 - 2017-09-21
review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=189004 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
incorrect information regarding his Minnesota criminal record; and (4) that the circuit court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114105 - 2017-09-21
incorrect information regarding his Minnesota criminal record; and (4) that the circuit court should
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=114105 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Gary Curtis
used Michael Poivey, another inmate, as an informant. Poivey wore a wire and recorded his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19
used Michael Poivey, another inmate, as an informant. Poivey wore a wire and recorded his
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=11531 - 2017-09-19
State v. Donzell Thomas
that he should have been allowed to inspect personnel records of the officer in charge of the "sting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9944 - 2005-03-31
that he should have been allowed to inspect personnel records of the officer in charge of the "sting
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9944 - 2005-03-31
State v. Darryl H. Stegall
, however, concludes that Stegall did so, and that the record supports the circuit court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2788 - 2005-03-31
, however, concludes that Stegall did so, and that the record supports the circuit court’s finding
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2788 - 2005-03-31
COURT OF APPEALS
the record reflects “the reasoned application of the appropriate legal standard to the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32175 - 2008-03-25
the record reflects “the reasoned application of the appropriate legal standard to the relevant facts
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32175 - 2008-03-25
State v. Arthur G. Ptack
) by “expressly refer[ing] to the record or other evidence of defendant’s knowledge of the nature of the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12503 - 2005-03-31
) by “expressly refer[ing] to the record or other evidence of defendant’s knowledge of the nature of the charge
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12503 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. “The primary considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32893 - 2014-09-15
and the defendant has the burden to show unreasonableness from the record. Id. “The primary considerations
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32893 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482241 - 2022-02-09
not filed a response to it. Upon consideration of the report and an independent review of the record, we
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=482241 - 2022-02-09