Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13471 - 13480 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 13471 - 13480 of 63981 for records/1000.
COURT OF APPEALS DECISION DATED AND FILED October 17, 2006 Cornelia G. Clark Clerk of Court of A...
issues. This court reviewed the report, the response, and the record and concluded that there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26811 - 2006-10-16
issues. This court reviewed the report, the response, and the record and concluded that there were
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=26811 - 2006-10-16
Gordon Graham v. Linda Gerry
and unreasonably terminated his prior employment. We conclude that the record contains sufficient credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15387 - 2005-03-31
and unreasonably terminated his prior employment. We conclude that the record contains sufficient credible
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15387 - 2005-03-31
James A. O'Connor v. Milwaukee County Sheriff's Department
lacks standing to bring his motion. The record supports the trial court’s finding. Consequentially, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17645 - 2005-04-11
lacks standing to bring his motion. The record supports the trial court’s finding. Consequentially, we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17645 - 2005-04-11
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to file a response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the records and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
to file a response, and did not do so. We have independently reviewed the records and the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=987074 - 2025-07-22
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919430 - 2025-02-26
review of the Record as mandated by Anders and RULE 809.32, we conclude there is no arguable merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=919430 - 2025-02-26
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907310 - 2025-02-04
of the record, as mandated by Anders, and counsel’s report, we conclude
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=907310 - 2025-02-04
[PDF]
NOTICE
the record to reflect unequivocally that the sentencing court had imposed and stayed two consecutive ten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26962 - 2014-09-15
the record to reflect unequivocally that the sentencing court had imposed and stayed two consecutive ten
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26962 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
right to file a response, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814801 - 2024-06-24
right to file a response, and has responded. We have independently reviewed the record, the no-merit
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=814801 - 2024-06-24
[PDF]
NOTICE
, the response, and the record and concluded that there were no meritorious issues for appeal. ¶8 Wheeler now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26811 - 2014-09-15
, the response, and the record and concluded that there were no meritorious issues for appeal. ¶8 Wheeler now
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26811 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and excessive. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102304 - 2017-09-21
and excessive. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=102304 - 2017-09-21