Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13471 - 13480 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Search results 13471 - 13480 of 58245 for speedy trial.
Darrell E. Beth v. Margaret R. Beth
, Darrell petitioned the trial court to be relieved of the stipulated child support payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12340 - 2005-03-31
, Darrell petitioned the trial court to be relieved of the stipulated child support payments
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12340 - 2005-03-31
Pamela Mona Imme v. Bruce Wayne Imme
regarding child support.[1] Because the trial court had no authority to reconsider the 1997 order and Bruce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15569 - 2005-03-31
regarding child support.[1] Because the trial court had no authority to reconsider the 1997 order and Bruce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=15569 - 2005-03-31
Jennie E. Stelter v. Green Lantern Restaurant, Inc.
claims the trial court should have granted default judgment in her favor because Green Lantern’s answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2804 - 2005-03-31
claims the trial court should have granted default judgment in her favor because Green Lantern’s answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2804 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Michael L. Sellers
him of one count of battery, contrary to § 940.19(1), STATS. He claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9319 - 2017-09-19
him of one count of battery, contrary to § 940.19(1), STATS. He claims that the trial court erred
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9319 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
Walter L. Merten v. Robin McGruder
. The McGruders argue that the trial court erred in ruling that Merten was entitled to damages for lost rent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10014 - 2017-09-19
. The McGruders argue that the trial court erred in ruling that Merten was entitled to damages for lost rent
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10014 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that: (1) he is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence; and (2) the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573219 - 2022-10-04
that: (1) he is entitled to a new trial based on newly discovered evidence; and (2) the circuit court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=573219 - 2022-10-04
[PDF]
Lee Boyd v. Ralph Gesualdo
, J.1 Lee Boyd appeals from a judgment after a bench trial in small claims court. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4177 - 2017-09-19
, J.1 Lee Boyd appeals from a judgment after a bench trial in small claims court. Although
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=4177 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Erik W. Parlow
that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. We cannot agree and affirm the trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14387 - 2014-09-15
that there was insufficient evidence to sustain the conviction. We cannot agree and affirm the trial court’s judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=14387 - 2014-09-15
Cory A. Emmerich v. American Honda Motor Company, Inc.
that the evidence does not support the jury’s finding on causation. He also argues that the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11896 - 2005-03-31
that the evidence does not support the jury’s finding on causation. He also argues that the trial court improperly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11896 - 2005-03-31
State v. Glenn Eric Rhodes
appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s order denying his motion to modify sentence. Rhodes pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14158 - 2005-03-31
appeals, pro se, from the trial court’s order denying his motion to modify sentence. Rhodes pled guilty
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14158 - 2005-03-31