Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13481 - 13490 of 58492 for speedy trial.
Search results 13481 - 13490 of 58492 for speedy trial.
State v. Kurt W. Meyer
, substantial battery with intent to do substantial harm, and disorderly conduct. Meyer claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2967 - 2005-03-31
, substantial battery with intent to do substantial harm, and disorderly conduct. Meyer claims the trial court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2967 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
NOTICE
-06)1 motion. He claims that the trial 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31767 - 2014-09-15
-06)1 motion. He claims that the trial 1 All
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=31767 - 2014-09-15
General Casualty Company of Wisconsin v. Cameron Gilbert
. The law firm claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9697 - 2005-03-31
. The law firm claims that: (1) the trial court erred in denying its motion for summary judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=9697 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Francis Liu v. Mark Chao
judgment. The trial court dismissed the complaint after a trial to the court. We affirm its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9730 - 2017-09-19
judgment. The trial court dismissed the complaint after a trial to the court. We affirm its judgment
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9730 - 2017-09-19
Jennie E. Stelter v. Green Lantern Restaurant, Inc.
claims the trial court should have granted default judgment in her favor because Green Lantern’s answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2804 - 2005-03-31
claims the trial court should have granted default judgment in her favor because Green Lantern’s answer
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=2804 - 2005-03-31
State v. Eugene Nichols
to §§ 943.20(1)(a), 943.20(3)(a), 943.11, 943.01 and 939.05, Stats. He claims that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10743 - 2005-03-31
to §§ 943.20(1)(a), 943.20(3)(a), 943.11, 943.01 and 939.05, Stats. He claims that the trial court erroneously
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10743 - 2005-03-31
Ted Beckingham v. John Randolph Myers, M.D.
Beckingham appeals a trial court judgment finding that Dr. John Myers was not negligent in treating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10519 - 2005-03-31
Beckingham appeals a trial court judgment finding that Dr. John Myers was not negligent in treating
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10519 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. Postconviction, Lassa sought to withdraw his pleas based on trial counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595587 - 2022-12-06
. Postconviction, Lassa sought to withdraw his pleas based on trial counsel’s alleged ineffectiveness
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=595587 - 2022-12-06
[PDF]
Thomas Willan v. Columbia County
that No. 00-0592 2 Columbia County had complied with the trial court’s writ of mandamus.1 Willan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2333 - 2017-09-19
that No. 00-0592 2 Columbia County had complied with the trial court’s writ of mandamus.1 Willan
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2333 - 2017-09-19
COURT OF APPEALS
violated when the State failed to disclose certain evidence to him prior to trial. For the reasons set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133334 - 2015-01-21
violated when the State failed to disclose certain evidence to him prior to trial. For the reasons set
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=133334 - 2015-01-21