Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13491 - 13500 of 50070 for our.
Search results 13491 - 13500 of 50070 for our.
State v. Robert J. Barnes
, we also express our concern that defendants like Barnes are simply being warehoused in state prisons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13395 - 2005-03-31
, we also express our concern that defendants like Barnes are simply being warehoused in state prisons
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13395 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
to withdraw his plea, which the circuit court denied based on our supreme court’s decision in State v. B.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032914 - 2025-11-04
to withdraw his plea, which the circuit court denied based on our supreme court’s decision in State v. B.W
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1032914 - 2025-11-04
CA Blank Order
a circuit court order denying his postconviction motion for the appointment of counsel. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113484 - 2014-06-03
a circuit court order denying his postconviction motion for the appointment of counsel. Based on our review
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113484 - 2014-06-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
addressing No. 2016AP62-CRNM 2 Rosner’s response. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191897 - 2017-09-21
addressing No. 2016AP62-CRNM 2 Rosner’s response. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=191897 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
whether there would be arguable merit to a challenge to Goins’s sentence. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478456 - 2022-02-03
whether there would be arguable merit to a challenge to Goins’s sentence. Our review of a sentence
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=478456 - 2022-02-03
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(citation omitted). Based on our review of the circuit court’s plea colloquy with Townsend and Townsend’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471711 - 2022-01-19
(citation omitted). Based on our review of the circuit court’s plea colloquy with Townsend and Townsend’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=471711 - 2022-01-19
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
.” In State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶42, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W.2d 828, our supreme court withdrew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186890 - 2017-09-21
.” In State v. Harbor, 2011 WI 28, ¶42, 333 Wis. 2d 53, 797 N.W.2d 828, our supreme court withdrew
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=186890 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
). 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170712 - 2017-09-21
). 1 Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=170712 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of employment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116658 - 2017-09-21
of employment. Based upon our review of the briefs and record, we conclude at conference that this case
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=116658 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. John R. Jagusch
counsel’s testimony precludes our review of the matter. No(s). 00-0007 5 relief asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2099 - 2017-09-19
counsel’s testimony precludes our review of the matter. No(s). 00-0007 5 relief asserted
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=2099 - 2017-09-19