Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13491 - 13500 of 63981 for records/1000.
Search results 13491 - 13500 of 63981 for records/1000.
State v. Tashonia B.
of the record, this court concludes that the appeal raises no issue of arguable merit. Therefore, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12320 - 2005-03-31
of the record, this court concludes that the appeal raises no issue of arguable merit. Therefore, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=12320 - 2005-03-31
State v. Tracey T. Williams
According to the criminal complaints and other portions of the records, on July 21, 2001, Williams battered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6241 - 2005-03-31
According to the criminal complaints and other portions of the records, on July 21, 2001, Williams battered
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6241 - 2005-03-31
CA Blank Order
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140294 - 2015-04-20
not responded. Upon our independent review of the record as mandated by Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=140294 - 2015-04-20
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
unsupported by facts in the record. Id., ¶29. ¶12 Here, we are satisfied that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234412 - 2019-02-13
unsupported by facts in the record. Id., ¶29. ¶12 Here, we are satisfied that the circuit court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=234412 - 2019-02-13
[PDF]
County of Milwaukee v. Ellen T. Roy
. The trial court acknowledged, however, that the discussions at the final pretrial were not on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13750 - 2014-09-15
. The trial court acknowledged, however, that the discussions at the final pretrial were not on the record
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13750 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762402 - 2024-02-13
and an independent review of the record, we conclude that the judgment may be summarily affirmed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=762402 - 2024-02-13
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
. No. 2014AP2166-CRNM 2 report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138598 - 2017-09-21
. No. 2014AP2166-CRNM 2 report and has not responded. Upon our independent review of the record
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=138598 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101834 - 2017-09-21
of the report, but has not filed a response. Upon reviewing the entire record, as well as the no-merit report
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=101834 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Clyde P.
had a "stable" home life. After reviewing the record of the waiver proceedings, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9455 - 2017-09-19
had a "stable" home life. After reviewing the record of the waiver proceedings, this court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=9455 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
independent review of the record, I conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600834 - 2022-12-15
independent review of the record, I conclude that there is no arguable merit to any issue that could
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=600834 - 2022-12-15