Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13491 - 13500 of 23506 for tawnee stone 2001.

WI App 23 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP1414 Complete Title of...
Seatz’s appeal requires us to interpret a statute, which we do de novo. State v. Skibinski, 2001 WI App
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=107401 - 2014-02-25

State v. James G. Langenbach
made, see State v. Samuel, 2001 WI App 25, ¶42, 240 Wis. 2d 756, 623 N.W.2d 565 (right to object exists
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6773 - 2005-03-31

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Kate A. Christnot
by telephone some 20 times between September 1999 and September 2001. He tried to visit her at her office
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=16825 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
counsel’s admission of deficient conduct. State v. Kimbrough, 2001 WI App 138, ¶35, 246 Wis. 2d 648, 630
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=29288 - 2007-06-05

COURT OF APPEALS
on Obriecht’s future filings in this court, pursuant to State v. Casteel, 2001 WI App 188, 247 Wis. 2d 451, 634
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=54227 - 2010-09-15

State v. Robert K.
on June 22, 2001. The petition for termination of parental rights was filed on July 17, 2003, and alleged
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=7640 - 2005-03-31

State v. James G. Halverson
, 2001 WI 5, ¶16, 241 Wis. 2d 52, 621 N.W.2d 891. We then independently evaluate those facts against
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=5070 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] CA Blank Order
the third party has common authority over the premises to be searched. State v. Matejka, 2001 WI 5, ¶19
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=159645 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] Patricia L. Guy v. Maurice A. Pulley
. STAT. § 806.02; Shirk v. Bowling, Inc., 2001 WI 36, ¶15, 242 Wis. 2d 153, 624 N.W.2d 375. The time
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=26317 - 2017-09-21

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court’s decision on a motion to suppress based on a two-step standard of review. State v. Eason, 2001
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=249376 - 2019-10-30