Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13491 - 13500 of 20880 for word.

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
the wording of the Fourth Amendment is directed.’” Welsh v. Wisconsin, 466 U.S. 740, 748 (1984) (citing
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=683663 - 2023-07-27

[PDF] WI APP 88
supervision was revoked. Id. In other words, the circuit court concluded that the revocation of Presley’s
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=448265 - 2022-01-13

Jaime R. Peterson v. Volkswagen of America, Inc.
appearing in the statute are given their accepted technical or legal definitions while nontechnical words
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=18355 - 2005-05-26

Kimberly Area School District v. Susan Zdanovec
the contract"; in other words, arbitrators cannot determine whether they have the authority to decide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=13763 - 2005-03-31

[PDF] Tracy A. Buening v. Wisconsin Department of Health and Social Services
meaning to every word of a statute. Jauquet Lumber Co. v. Kolbe & Kolbe Millwork Co., 164 Wis.2d 689, 700
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7828 - 2017-09-19

[PDF] State v. Bobby D. Salas
controversy. ¶19 We conclude that although the circuit court could have selected its words more wisely
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7212 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
court said that “[a]lthough cases sometimes use the words ‘forfeiture’ and ‘waiver’ interchangeably
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=491819 - 2022-03-08

[PDF] Jessica M.F. v. Liberty Mutual Fire Ins. Co.
of the insured would have understood the words of the contract to mean.” Id. at 90, 540 N.W.2d at 32
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10148 - 2017-09-19

COURT OF APPEALS
probability’ is a probability sufficient to undermine confidence in the outcome.” In other words, “strictly
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=47729 - 2010-03-08

COURT OF APPEALS
and agreement ….” (Emphasis added). Thums claims that by using the word “an” rather than “and,” the court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=99899 - 2013-07-24