Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1351 - 1360 of 6309 for 208.
Search results 1351 - 1360 of 6309 for 208.
[PDF]
WI APP 84
, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 188-90, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). 13 ¶27 WCA, and not the County, also points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176587 - 2017-09-21
, 208 Wis. 2d 166, 188-90, 560 N.W.2d 246 (1997). 13 ¶27 WCA, and not the County, also points
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=176587 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
John T. Morris v. Juneau County
-2507 7 State v. Rosenburg, 208 Wis. 2d 191, 194, 560 N.W.2d 266 (1997) (citing Scott v. First
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17149 - 2017-09-21
-2507 7 State v. Rosenburg, 208 Wis. 2d 191, 194, 560 N.W.2d 266 (1997) (citing Scott v. First
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=17149 - 2017-09-21
State v. Charles E. Hennings
. Bauer, 109 Wis. 2d 204, 208 n.3, 325 N.W.2d 857 (1982). ¶23 In Bauer, our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3408 - 2005-03-31
. Bauer, 109 Wis. 2d 204, 208 n.3, 325 N.W.2d 857 (1982). ¶23 In Bauer, our supreme
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3408 - 2005-03-31
2007 WI APP 255
credit to which he was entitled. Id.; see also State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d 325, 330, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30753 - 2007-12-18
credit to which he was entitled. Id.; see also State v. Rohl, 160 Wis. 2d 325, 330, 466 N.W.2d 208 (Ct
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=30753 - 2007-12-18
[PDF]
WI APP 255
208 (Ct. App. 1991) ((“credit for a single episode of jail time toward two (or more) sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30753 - 2014-09-15
208 (Ct. App. 1991) ((“credit for a single episode of jail time toward two (or more) sentences
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=30753 - 2014-09-15
John T. Morris v. Juneau County
interpretation is to discern the intent of the legislature. See State v. Rosenburg, 208 Wis. 2d 191, 194, 560
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17149 - 2005-03-31
interpretation is to discern the intent of the legislature. See State v. Rosenburg, 208 Wis. 2d 191, 194, 560
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17149 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Charles E. Hennings
.” State v. Bauer, 109 Wis. 2d 204, 208 n.3, 325 N.W.2d 857 (1982). ¶23 In Bauer, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3408 - 2017-09-19
.” State v. Bauer, 109 Wis. 2d 204, 208 n.3, 325 N.W.2d 857 (1982). ¶23 In Bauer, our supreme court
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=3408 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
State v. Joshua L. Howland
. Suchocki, 208 Wis. 2d 509, 518, 561 N.W.2d 332 (Ct. App. 1997). The securing of a PSI is an integral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5529 - 2017-09-19
. Suchocki, 208 Wis. 2d 509, 518, 561 N.W.2d 332 (Ct. App. 1997). The securing of a PSI is an integral
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5529 - 2017-09-19
[PDF]
exists that a different result would be reached in a trial.’” Id. (quoting State v. McCallum, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588877 - 2022-11-10
exists that a different result would be reached in a trial.’” Id. (quoting State v. McCallum, 208 Wis
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=588877 - 2022-11-10
[PDF]
State v. Deshawn Reed
exclusive or joint dominion and control. See Schmidt v. State, 77 Wis.2d 370, 379, 253 N.W.2d 204, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12131 - 2017-09-21
exclusive or joint dominion and control. See Schmidt v. State, 77 Wis.2d 370, 379, 253 N.W.2d 204, 208
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12131 - 2017-09-21