Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 1351 - 1360 of 30175 for de.
Search results 1351 - 1360 of 30175 for de.
COURT OF APPEALS
of review is de novo for the dual reason that we review summary judgment de novo and the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32764 - 2008-05-27
of review is de novo for the dual reason that we review summary judgment de novo and the interpretation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=32764 - 2008-05-27
[PDF]
NOTICE
motion. The commissioner granted the motion and Strociek sought a de novo hearing before the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32159 - 2014-09-15
motion. The commissioner granted the motion and Strociek sought a de novo hearing before the circuit
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=32159 - 2014-09-15
State v. Donald R. Riddle
to those facts is a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4967 - 2005-03-31
to those facts is a question of law that we decide de novo. State v. Patricia A.P., 195 Wis. 2d 855, 862
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4967 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
. Whether a defendant made a sufficient showing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243860 - 2019-07-24
. Whether a defendant made a sufficient showing is a question of law that we review de novo. Id., ¶20
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=243860 - 2019-07-24
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
and detached magistrate” is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Neuaone, 2005
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92654 - 2014-09-15
and detached magistrate” is a question of constitutional fact that we review de novo. State v. Neuaone, 2005
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=92654 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Luis A. Martinez
fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5273 - 2017-09-19
fact unless they are clearly erroneous; however, we review de novo a trial court’s conclusion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=5273 - 2017-09-19
John Marder v. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System
that we should review the trial court de novo and bar the release of those documents, because the damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14572 - 2005-03-31
that we should review the trial court de novo and bar the release of those documents, because the damage
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=14572 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
Arlo M. Tratz v. Judy P. Smith
, Tratz filed a request for a de novo review of the small claims court’s judgment. On October 31, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13511 - 2017-09-21
, Tratz filed a request for a de novo review of the small claims court’s judgment. On October 31, 1997
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=13511 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66710 - 2014-09-15
a judgment of the circuit court for Waukesha County: LINDA M. VAN DE WATER, Judge. Modified
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=66710 - 2014-09-15
[PDF]
State v. Scott M. Doering
stop of Doering’s vehicle was reasonable is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6500 - 2017-09-19
stop of Doering’s vehicle was reasonable is a question of law that we review de novo. State v. Guzy
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=6500 - 2017-09-19