Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13511 - 13520 of 74391 for a ha.

WI App 103 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP2827 Complete Title o...
a party has a right to a contested case hearing under Wis. Stat. § 227.42(1) is a question of law that we
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=120635 - 2014-10-28

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
. We disagree and therefore affirm the court’s order. BACKGROUND ¶2 Stanley has been subject
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=598321 - 2022-12-06

WI App 21 court of appeals of wisconsin published opinion Case No.: 2013AP416 Complete Title of ...
.2d 245 (Ct. App. 1995). ¶6 Whether a party has standing to seek declaratory relief presents
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=135322 - 2015-03-24

Kevin Thomas v. David H. Schwarz
that Thomas was asking the trial court “to interpret the statutes to create a rule that has never existed
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=25770 - 2006-08-06

[PDF] State v. Jeremy P.
N.W.2d 1 (“A circuit court has discretion under WIS. STAT. § 938.34(16) to stay that part
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7296 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] State v. Kirk Bintzler
counsel at public expense. Bintzler’s appellate counsel has filed a no merit report under Anders v
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=10256 - 2017-09-20

[PDF] WI APP 103
). ¶12 Whether a party has a right to a contested case hearing under WIS. STAT. § 227.42(1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=120635 - 2014-11-11

[PDF] WI 44
to pay restitution to his former firm in the amount of $24,358.50. As neither party has appealed from
/sc/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=1010469 - 2025-09-12

COURT OF APPEALS
the United States Constitution and no published Wisconsin case has yet addressed that issue under Heller
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=81085 - 2012-04-16

[PDF] NOTICE
this issue in this case in order to preserve its claim here. However, the supreme court has rejected both
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=52450 - 2014-09-15