Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13511 - 13520 of 33828 for dismissal.
Search results 13511 - 13520 of 33828 for dismissal.
CA Blank Order
guilty to first-degree reckless homicide. In exchange, the State agreed to dismiss the “while armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
guilty to first-degree reckless homicide. In exchange, the State agreed to dismiss the “while armed
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=142467 - 2015-05-21
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
[her] objection.” The court therefore dismissed the objection for lack of prosecution. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822771 - 2024-07-09
[her] objection.” The court therefore dismissed the objection for lack of prosecution. The court
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=822771 - 2024-07-09
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
moved for a directed verdict seeking to dismiss the charge. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219216 - 2018-09-18
moved for a directed verdict seeking to dismiss the charge. The circuit court denied the motion
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=219216 - 2018-09-18
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that was presented in open court. In exchange for Nockerts’ plea, the State agreed to dismiss and read in a felony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185242 - 2017-09-21
that was presented in open court. In exchange for Nockerts’ plea, the State agreed to dismiss and read in a felony
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=185242 - 2017-09-21
State v. Bobby D. Swift
. At the close of the State’s case, Swift moved for dismissal arguing that the State had failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10685 - 2005-03-31
. At the close of the State’s case, Swift moved for dismissal arguing that the State had failed to prove
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=10685 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
4 dismissed and the October 7, 2013 status hearing date would be removed from the court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155858 - 2017-09-21
4 dismissed and the October 7, 2013 status hearing date would be removed from the court’s
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=155858 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
Armament Systems and Procedures, Inc. v. Federated Mutual Insurance Company
sought dismissal of Armament’s complaint contending that its policy did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12563 - 2017-09-21
sought dismissal of Armament’s complaint contending that its policy did not provide
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=12563 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
State v. Bruce W. Cummings
DISTRICT ATTORNEY]: Count 1, your honor. I would move to dismiss Count 2. THE COURT: Count 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15903 - 2017-09-21
DISTRICT ATTORNEY]: Count 1, your honor. I would move to dismiss Count 2. THE COURT: Count 1
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=15903 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
FICE OF THE CLERK
injury. The hit and run charge was dismissed as a read-in at sentencing. 3 Gulley misstates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93817 - 2014-09-15
injury. The hit and run charge was dismissed as a read-in at sentencing. 3 Gulley misstates
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=93817 - 2014-09-15
COURT OF APPEALS
, Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Elisa M. Rose appeals from the order dismissing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35734 - 2009-03-04
, Vergeront and Lundsten, JJ. ¶1 PER CURIAM. Elisa M. Rose appeals from the order dismissing her
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=35734 - 2009-03-04