Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13511 - 13520 of 58819 for o j.

Jennifer Louise Kunert v. Lyle Herman Kunert
. In response to a question regarding her present use of alcoholic beverages, Jennifer testified that "[o]nce
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=11604 - 2005-03-31

COURT OF APPEALS
304, 317, 401 N.W.2d 816 (1987) (“[O]ur first task is to determine whether plaintiffs have stated
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=132647 - 2015-01-07

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
cite one of the advantages?” (emphasis added) Michlowski responded: [O]ne of the advantages would
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=681996 - 2023-07-26

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
that “[t]o establish prejudice in the context of a postconviction motion to withdraw a guilty plea based
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=255522 - 2020-03-03

COURT OF APPEALS
of this finding: they state in their response brief that “[o]n May 14, 2008, no building existed on the property
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=62027 - 2011-03-30

COURT OF APPEALS
way to[o] fast.”
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=113805 - 2014-06-09

[PDF] COURT OF APPEALS
rights is discretionary. Gerald O. v. Cindy R., 203 Wis. 2d 148, 152, 551 N.W.2d 855 (Ct. App. 1996
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=701838 - 2023-09-12

[PDF] NOTICE
,” and that “[o]ur court has been willing to assume jurisdiction of a case, notwithstanding a party’s failure
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=56142 - 2014-09-15

COURT OF APPEALS
directs us to the general proposition that “[o]rdinarily, reasonable diligence is a question of fact
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=83630 - 2012-06-13

State v. Kenneth P. Sarauer
, 814-15 (1975). “At the trial level, ‘[t]o force a lawyer on a defendant can only lead him to believe
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=6136 - 2005-03-31