Want to refine your search results? Try our advanced search.
Search results 13511 - 13520 of 15333 for probate.
Search results 13511 - 13520 of 15333 for probate.
State v. Tommie Thames
Thames on probation for five years, consecutive to counts one and two. ¶3 Thames
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17647 - 2005-05-24
Thames on probation for five years, consecutive to counts one and two. ¶3 Thames
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=17647 - 2005-05-24
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
probation was not appropriate and why it chose both concurrent and consecutive sentences. The maximum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103795 - 2017-09-21
probation was not appropriate and why it chose both concurrent and consecutive sentences. The maximum
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=103795 - 2017-09-21
COURT OF APPEALS
to a total of thirty-five years, consecutive to another sentence he was serving for his probation revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119176 - 2014-08-12
to a total of thirty-five years, consecutive to another sentence he was serving for his probation revocation
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=119176 - 2014-08-12
State v. Rickey Gray
of the 1975 and 1987 convictions were provided by a probation and parole agent and the psychologist from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3850 - 2005-03-31
of the 1975 and 1987 convictions were provided by a probation and parole agent and the psychologist from
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=3850 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
(2) IMMUNITY FROM CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND REVOCATION OF PAROLE, PROBATION, OR EXTENDED SUPERVISION
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=376161 - 2021-06-16
(2) IMMUNITY FROM CRIMINAL PROSECUTION AND REVOCATION OF PAROLE, PROBATION, OR EXTENDED SUPERVISION
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=376161 - 2021-06-16
[PDF]
CA Blank Order
that probation was not appropriate because it would unduly depreciate the seriousness of the offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172319 - 2017-09-21
that probation was not appropriate because it would unduly depreciate the seriousness of the offense
/ca/smd/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=172319 - 2017-09-21
[PDF]
COURT OF APPEALS
probation revocation. He contends Hart promised him he would get a maximum of “five, ten years.” ¶29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119176 - 2014-09-15
probation revocation. He contends Hart promised him he would get a maximum of “five, ten years.” ¶29
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=119176 - 2014-09-15
State v. Jeremy T. Greer
would receive five years of probation. ¶7 Hargrove then took Greer to a different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4421 - 2005-03-31
would receive five years of probation. ¶7 Hargrove then took Greer to a different
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.html?content=html&seqNo=4421 - 2005-03-31
[PDF]
State v. Mark L. Auger
) If a court imposes a sentence on an adult person or places an adult person on probation, regardless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7123 - 2017-09-20
) If a court imposes a sentence on an adult person or places an adult person on probation, regardless
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=7123 - 2017-09-20
[PDF]
NOTICE
). She was then sentenced to one year of probation with a stayed sentence of six months in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53818 - 2014-09-15
). She was then sentenced to one year of probation with a stayed sentence of six months in jail
/ca/opinion/DisplayDocument.pdf?content=pdf&seqNo=53818 - 2014-09-15